English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

George W. Bush is a moron! Why did he go into Iraq in the first place? Two years prior to the invasion. He said that Saddam Hussain was not a threat and a target for terrorism (talking about 9/11). Two years later he is accusing him of weapons of mass destruction and sheltering members of Al-Queda. Two years, 3 000 lives and $300 billon later. No weapons found, no evidance of Saddam hiding Al-Queda. Even so, why did he have to bomb a country to (protect it's citizens even though he killed 30 000 of them to get one guy.) He demonstrated hypocrisy, murder, war mongering, money theft and lying all at one time. He can't speak, he's unpopular (I'm Canadian and live in Canada, I would know), people are losing their jobs. Money is shipped out the door. Our southern neighbours are in debt. Why does Clinton get impeached for loving his intern and Bush dosen't for killing people and lying (which is why Clinton got impeached.) Impeach President Bush and get a decent leader in the States.

2006-06-21 15:25:16 · 35 answers · asked by centreofclassicrock 4 in Politics & Government Government

35 answers

Worst President ever. Can't read worth a damn. Stutters like a crack head. Claims to be a christian yet was part of Skull and Bones. an occult like group from Yale who drink wine from dead people's skulls because they think they will gain wisdom. Was caught at the Bohemian grove were they do mock sacrifices of a naked woman to an owl god.
And Osama hated Saddam. There were no connections to Osama and Saddam according to Israeli, German, British, C.I.A Intelligence. Osama never stayed at one of his mansions, and as a matter of fact they couldn't stand one another. Some people thought that Osama would go after Saddam before America.
People need to check out infowars.com or prisonplanet.com. There you will see just how great of a man Mr. Bush really is, from the viewpoint of a republican who exposed him.

2006-06-21 15:38:14 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 23 6

Guess you all haven't watched today's newscasts, as they
did find "weapons of mass destruction". So now, should you
all apologize for calling Bush a liar? He's trying to help Iraq
rid themselves of terrorists so they can live a peaceful and
nice life like you and Americans do. He should be praised for
trying to help non-Americans get a decent life. What if those terrorists
were in our back yard setting off bombs in libraries, restaurants,
schools, streets, etc.? You'd want America or another country
to help. And about Clinton, he was getting paid by this nation's
taxpayers while he was "doing his thing with Monica" in the
White House, no less. At least he could have been on his own
time and somewhere else. He actually disgraced the White
House which most Americans feel is rather sacred and a place
of honor for whomever is President. It's easy to see which one
represents a leader we should be proud of trying to help others.
Bush is not a wimp like John Kerry and the other Democrats
that want to "cut and run". The US has never done that and
shouldn't now.

2006-06-21 15:47:36 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No I don't agree ,First off , have you ever heard of so many natural disasters in the world ( in such a short period ).He has tried to deal with many of those issues and protect , other innocent people from a life we have never suffered , as they have and are ! Yes , thousands have died and more were sentenced to death by Saddam than anyone could really prove .Yet Bush is bad , we sit in our homes , with shelter , computer s , freedom to blast our President . And Good thing is Canada may welcome Saddam if he escapes . Sorry this guy is a Canadian some might be saying . I'm grateful we are not in Iraq and my children are safe . They don't fear strangers pulling them out of the house and beheading their parents , raping a child and then killing the child .If you want to sound off , one man couldn't decide all of this alone , nor can he be blamed for all the horrible actions ( some of the service people have done ! ) .Clinton had so much free time he could have a lover , Bush probably eats , sleeps , walks , about all that has happened when he has been in office !

2006-06-21 15:45:13 · answer #3 · answered by Fairy Tale 4 · 0 0

Okay, okay, you're blaming the economy on him. Economy 101... America isn't Canada. In America, the economy has very little to do with the President. We're not socialist here, the economy is very independent, in almost every way (outside of laws and interest rates, which aren't controled by the President, which completely blows your claim that the economy's failure is due to Bush), from the government.

As for Iraq, yeah, he said Iraq wasn't a big deal.... then we had 9/11. We've also proven connections between Bin Laden and Iraq (Bin Laden stayed in one of Saddam's mansions for three months after he left Saudi Arabia), and let's not forget about Saddam's attempt to kill the first President Bush.

Also, Bush has stuck to his word. He said that anybody woh harbored terrorists, or supported them were an enemy to the US.

And we can't impeach Bush. He hasn't done anything illegal. The Constitution sets up the grounds for impeachment, and nothing he has done qualifies.

Also, another thing you seem to miss, since we've gone into Iraq, we've drawn out approximately 90% of Al Quaida, drawn them into Iraq, and now we have the world's largest terrorist network on a battlefield. Nobody has ever been able to get a terrorist network on a battlefield before, which makes it a lot easier to defeat them.

And I'm not sure what you being in Canada would have to do with knowing how unpopular he is, and I'm not sure why being unpopular means he's done a bad job.

2006-06-21 15:38:23 · answer #4 · answered by rliedtky 2 · 0 0

George Bush is not a "bad" president. He inherited quite a mess from the previous administration. How many times did the previous administration ignore attacks on our interests before George Bush assumed office in 2001? He hasn't proven to be a great president either, but all the cards have not yet been played. I don't know where you get most of your information, but it seems that you are not being very open-minded. Try listening to a bit of "Talk Radio" such as Neal Boortz, Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity or Rush. Listen to them for awhile then see if you still believe all those accusations. People interchange the word "liar" with "mistaken" or "misinformed" a lot these days. Try using a bit less caustic verbage in your venting your frustrations.

2006-06-21 15:42:09 · answer #5 · answered by gedanini3@yahoo.com 2 · 0 0

Wow, you have an interesting view of the facts there buddy. No leader worth his weight in pennies would let on that he was planning to invade another country before he was ready to. Saddam Hussein and Al-Queda were never mentioned as being co-horts. Too many of you morons think that sponsoring terrorism automatically means being aligned with Al-Queda. Clinton should have been impeached for screwing around under his desk and not serving his country above it. Because of his do-nothing presidency, Al-Queda was able to hit us and Saddam Hussein was able to continue hiding his WMD's and making deals with Syria and Russia. The truth is out there in black and white print. You don't need to skew it in order to see it. Keep your narrow-minded reasoning where it isn't needed-CANADA. Don't you have something else better to whine about, like not having a Stanley Cup winner for the last 12 seasons?

2006-06-21 15:33:14 · answer #6 · answered by Awesome Bill 7 · 0 0

Yeah i agree, he is a complete idiot. All he cares about with iraq is finishing what his father started and getting his hands on oil. There were no weapons of mass destruction ans he knew that. He bomb the place to convince the american people that he is upholding democracy and liberty by killing Al-Queda operatives, but what they dont realise is that it is innocent civillians that are dying.

2006-06-21 15:39:34 · answer #7 · answered by The all Knowing 1 · 0 0

listen nucker, I spent a lot of time in canada growing up played a lot of hockey their. I am guessing you are eastern canadian or french cause you suck. dont worry about us and you know what just shut up. although your country is nice dipshits like you just make it not so bueno. maybe we should put a wall up on the northern border too. Maybe if your country grew some stones then we wouldnt have to do it all. I also know the western half of your country doesn't suck like the east in terms of having nuts. Have a nice day oh and by the way molson is *** beer.

2006-06-21 15:34:09 · answer #8 · answered by brian 1 · 0 0

Bush is worse than bad. He s??ks big time. You have a point there!! IMPEACH! IMPEACH! This is his war, are we going to have another World War or Vietnam?? I live in Indiana, I know he can't speak, and among other things he doesn't have a brain. I agree with everything you said at 200%!!

2006-06-21 15:33:46 · answer #9 · answered by Dottie 6 · 0 0

Individuals like yourself could care less that we DID just find WMD's, watch the news. Regardless of any POSITIVE outcomes that come from his administration they would be dismissed simply because it is a conservative in the White House. Rather than focusing on whats best for the Country as a whole, you are only concerned about your own ideological wishes.

2006-06-21 16:09:23 · answer #10 · answered by Cool Breeze 1 · 0 0

Cry a river. He is an awesome President and you need to remember that he won the election because the more people voted for him than for other candidates. Just some people are having 2nd thoughts about their choice.

2006-06-21 15:39:18 · answer #11 · answered by Japal911 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers