English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Does FOX NEWS, Sean Hannity and Antichrist Ann Coulter speak for The United States and George W. Bush?
Did the US go to WAR IN IRAQ for pre-war, 1991 antiquated weapons?
Is this why AMERICAN TROOPS are killing and dying in IRAQ?
Is the IRAQI PRESIDENT calling the shots for the UNITED STATES now?
Has the PENTAGON been shut down?

2006-06-21 15:12:52 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

8 answers

Please note the first five entries were made PRIOR to President Bush becoming our president.... and then, we have Hiliary's entry!


"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998.

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998.

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998.

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998.

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

NOW THE DEMOCRATS SAY PRESIDENT BUSH LIED, THAT THERE NEVER WERE ANY WMD'S AND HE TOOK US TO WAR FOR HIS OIL BUDDIES??? Right!!!

And now.....Reported on FoxNews 6/21/2004

WASHINGTON — The United States has found 500 chemical weapons in Iraq since 2003, and more weapons of mass destruction are likely to be uncovered, two Republican lawmakers said Wednesday.

"We have found weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, chemical weapons," Sen. Rick Santorum, R-Pa., said in a quickly called press conference late Wednesday afternoon.

Reading from a declassified portion of a report by the National Ground Intelligence Center, a Defense Department intelligence unit, Santorum said: "Since 2003, coalition forces have recovered approximately 500 weapons munitions which contain degraded mustard or sarin nerve agent. Despite many efforts to locate and destroy Iraq's pre-Gulf War chemical munitions, filled and unfilled pre-Gulf War chemical munitions are assessed to still exist."
He added that the report warns about the hazards that the chemical weapons could still pose to coalition troops in Iraq.

"The purity of the agents inside the munitions depends on many factors, including the manufacturing process, potential additives and environmental storage conditions. While agents degrade over time, chemical warfare agents remain hazardous and potentially lethal," Santorum read from the document.

"This says weapons have been discovered, more weapons exist and they state that Iraq was not a WMD-free zone, that there are continuing threats from the materials that are or may still be in Iraq," said Rep. Pete Hoekstra, R-Mich., chairman of the House Intelligence Committee.

The weapons are thought to be manufactured before 1991 so they would not be proof of an ongoing WMD program in the 1990s. But they do show that Saddam Hussein was lying when he said all weapons had been destroyed, and it shows that years of on-again, off-again weapons inspections did not uncover these munitions.

2006-06-21 16:07:31 · answer #1 · answered by MesquiteGal 4 · 1 1

FOX news is famous for being the mouthpiece of liberals.

No the Pentagon is not shut down, in fact it is stronger than ever, thanks to Dick Cheny. Dick Cheny is the strongest Vice President in history, almost a Co-President. One of his goals after 911 was to tie Irag into the terrorist threat. The Intelligence on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction was flawed. Dick Cheny did not trust the CIA because they failed to predict the rise of the Talaban, the fall of the Sha of Iran, and the rise of the Ayatollah in Iran. So when the CIA told the President that the Intelligence on Iraq may be flawed Cheny didn’t believe it.

Gas weapons are not antiquated weapons; as proved by the attack in the Japanese subway system. Sadam has used gas weapons on his own people (the Kurds). Russia and the US have experimented with Anthrax as a weapon, and Sadam had close ties to the Soviets, which is why his army was equipped with Russian Tanks, AK-47s and RPGs. Just after 911 an Anthrax attack was conducted in the Eastern US. Whoever made that attack is unknown, and has not been heard from since. It is relatively easy to make many gas weapons and the Soviets were know to have weaponized Anthrax, once that step is made then it is easy to breed it and make a whole lot more.

2006-06-21 22:38:49 · answer #2 · answered by Dan S 7 · 0 0

Weapons of Mass Deception is more accurate.

2006-06-21 23:40:03 · answer #3 · answered by MishMash [I am not one of your fans] 7 · 0 1

Ann Coulter wants to stick Bush's "WMD" down her throat!

2006-06-21 22:58:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

YES TO EVERYTHING! *note the sarcasm

wow stupidity amazes me.

2006-06-21 22:16:13 · answer #5 · answered by otexasgirlo 3 · 0 1

they have weapons of mass deception.

2006-06-21 22:49:13 · answer #6 · answered by kucitizenx 4 · 1 1

Yes, their rhetoric.

2006-06-21 22:23:21 · answer #7 · answered by Tyler 2 · 0 1

yes, their mouthes

2006-06-21 22:15:51 · answer #8 · answered by ? 7 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers