Specifically, during his 2003 State of the Union Address, Bush told the nation that Saddam had biological weapons sufficient to produce 25,000 liters of Anthrax, 38,000 liters of Botulinum Toxin, and 500 of tons of Mustard, Sarin in VX Nerve Gas.
THIS IS WHAT BUSH SAID BEFORE THE WAR.
2006-06-21
15:07:52
·
17 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
THE ALLEGED WMDS FOUND AND THE AMOUNTS BUSH GAVE IN HIS PROPAGANDA LEADING UP TO THE WAR DOES NOT ADD UP. DO YOU GET IT NEOCONS??
2006-06-21
15:14:06 ·
update #1
THE ANNTICHRIST COULTER AND FOX NEWS ARE SPEAKING FOR THE WHITE HOUSE NOW! what happened to Karl Rove, trouble again.
2006-06-21 15:18:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
9⤊
5⤋
The real issue with the war is not WMD's. Saddam was a vicious dictator and the world is better off without him. The problem was the lack of planning and execution. Bush's plan basically seemed to be to hope the Iraqi people would suddenly have a group hug and form a democratic state. That hasn't happened. There are more terrorists in Iraq now than before the war. According to the 911 commission, the links between Saddam and terrorists organizations was weak at best. So GWB has just created a breeding ground for terrorists and the longer we stay there, the more people will hate us. He created a big freakin mess.
2006-06-21 15:32:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by beren 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
many things were said way before the war in Irak which proves that every thing is from an very old strategy
the peoples suffer from tunnel vision ,failing to see the whole picture because they are standing to close
" It is the sacred principles enshrined in the United Nations charter to which the American people will henceforth pledge their allegiance. "
- Bush I addressing the General Assembly of the U.N., February 1,1992
" The world can therefore seize the opportunity (the Persian Gulf crisis) to fulfill the long held promise of a New World Order where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind. "
- Bush I in his State of the Union Address, January 29, 1991
" NAFTA is a major stepping stone to the New World Order. "
- Henry Kissinger when campaigning for the passage of NAFTA
" Further global progress is now possible only through a quest for universal consensus in the movement towards a new world order. "
- Mikhail Gorbachev, in an address at the United Nations, December 1988.
" The great masses of people will more easily fall victims to a big lie rather than a small one, especially if it is repeated over and over. " - Adolph Hitler
One of the least understood strategies of the world revolution now moving rapidly toward its goal is the use of mind control as a major means of obtaining the consent of the people who will be subjects of the New World Order. " - From The National Educator, K.M. Heaton
In the meantime, America is no longer a functioning republic (a constit- utional representative democracy). Elections are rigged, a free press is little to be found, liberties are being forcefully removed, corporate
price gouging and corruption is growing rampant, the nation is engaged in a state of perpetual war, biological warfare and profiteering from it on the American population is being planned by the White house, UN,
and pentagon, and an expected catastrophic economic depression on a scale larger than 1929 in America is looming just ahead, together with an assortment of other ills that would make a much longer list.
2006-06-21 15:21:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, Bush did speak of Saddam having all those WMDs before the war.
So did Kerry, Clinton, Teddy Kennedy, Tom Daschle, Nancy Pelosi, Sandy Berger, and other Democrats -- all before Bush was even President!
By the way, just today a cache of 500 canisters of chemical weapons were found in Iraq.
The news are saying it's a big development, but it didn't surprise me. Anyone without a Bush-hating agenda knew all along that Saddam already had these weapons.
Just as Clinton and Kerry and other big Dems did before Bush even became president.
2006-06-21 15:11:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
They HAVE found WMD's in artillery casings. Specifically Sarin. There were over 3000 artillery casings found. The link below is just one example. There are links on the blog to the actual articles from the San Francisco Chronicle and The Scotsman.
By the way I'm not a NEOCON. I'm an american that hates politics.
2006-06-21 15:14:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by mikis1967 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes and they had them, we know because the US supplied most of the weapons to him to fight the Russians.
Everyone knows most most likely went to another nation prior or right after the start of the war.
But that was not the main reason for the war, there was UN resolutions, Resolutions signed by Clinton, and the full congress voted and approved going to war,
Everyone knows the weapons were there, I have assumed that since alot were ones supplied by the US, the US did not want them to be found to show we supplied them weapons.
But we did not labs, we got thier scientists to talk about them, so of course they were there.
2006-06-21 15:13:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
they won't show the wmd because they don't exist.
they will trump up some 20 or 30 year old buried useless crap as wmd, but nobody will take that seriously. (except the neocons)
2006-06-21 15:52:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by kucitizenx 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Turn on Fox News, it has been reported that 500 chemical bombs have been found in Iraq. This was just released today.
2006-06-21 15:10:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by b c 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Does that really have any significance?
What does finding WMDs really prove? Their are enough problems to address without them. Who cares at this point?
2006-06-21 15:26:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
They have to check with FoxNews or Rush Limbaugh first, they don't get jack sh't, and that's the problem. Isn't our great country doing much better since Clinton was in office? ;)
2006-06-22 00:57:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by Elusive 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't care weather Saddam had wmd's or not. He still needed to be put in his place!
2006-06-21 15:10:18
·
answer #11
·
answered by Josh B 1
·
0⤊
0⤋