500 WMD's FOUND IN IRAQ!!!!! Goodbye libs ... it's been nice knowing ya.?

Question

It's so over for the libs now. They literally have NOTHING left to campaign on.

Wait until you see how they spin this news!

See how the libs spin?

spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin

The WMD's, no matter how old, are ABSOLUTE proof that Saddam lied about the existence of WMD's in his country. You're taking the word of an unnamed "source" over what the report actually says.

As far as them being old ... you think they still couldn't be used? Would you eat them as your crow because you think they're so harmless?

Buh bye libs. Buh bye. The killing of that prick Al-Zarqawi was just the beginning, this is step three, it over for you turds.

Buh bye.

Answer 1

They are going to try to spin it off and say they were old, the fact of teh matter is, Saddam was ordered to destroy all WMD's lights out Libs, been nice knowing ya!

Answer 2

Don't get your panties in a wad, the weapons were found 3 years ago, and the report was declassified today, perhaps you should read the whole story instead of just a headline.

The weapons were degraded to the point of being useless.

The whole thing was pulled off by a couple of Senators trying to look good for the sheep back home, hoping they would not read the details. I guess they were right, your a good example of that behavior.

"The weapons are thought to be manufactured before 1991 so they would not be proof of an ongoing WMD program in the 1990s."

"This does not reflect a capacity that was built up after 1991," the official said, adding the munitions "are not the WMDs this country and the rest of the world believed Iraq had, and not the WMDs for which this country went to war."

Whose spinning who?

Answer 3

Hey kid, read the whole report:

Offering the official administration response to FOX News, a senior Defense Department official pointed out that the chemical weapons were not in useable conditions.

"This does not reflect a capacity that was built up after 1991," the official said, adding the munitions
"are NOT the WMDs this country and the rest of the world believed Iraq had, and NOT the WMDs for which this country went to war."

THAT's why we call you guys mindless and that's why we aren't going away but celebrate all you want little kid. Bye! See u later this week when you wear off all that mud on your face. Thanks for making all the noise, and don't forget to clear this post. I've seen 2 others duck and run today.

Answer 4

They were found three years ago--and as far as just being declassified, I remember the first batch of 36 of them being found. It was reported in the news back in 2003. The shells were left over from the Persian Gulf War in 1991 and beyond useless.
People like Yahoo Wishes were crowing back then that this was definitive proof that the WMDs were found.

The story is coming out now because Rick Santorum is losing by double-digits to Bob Casey Jr in the Pennsylvania Senate race for this year.

Answer 5

I know I've heard Bush say in one speech recently that his administration was wrong about there being WMDs in Iraq. But doesn't WMDs include weapons other than huge missiles? If so, than what about the chemical ones Hussein used in the past. It doesn't matter what form of weapons, if Hussein had chemical weapons, then there's the WMDs right there. Maybe he never had missiles and so Bush made the comment about looking for WMDs being a mistake. But who said they had to be missiles? So I think that Hussein did have WMDs.

I know part of the idea for going after Hussein also was based on possible connections with Bin Laden and 9/11. I don't know what to think on that. Hussein would have been able to supply plenty of funding. But, then again, both may have had totally separate attack plans against the U.S. or anywhere else.

Well, I'll just watch Fox News or CNN to see what is said about any WMDs.

Answer 6

Yes let's invade a country for having 500 Old WMD's and have thousands of our soldiers killed all because our inept president wants vengence for his Daddy's failures. I can understand your jubilation as your failed party and leadership have had nothing to "cheer" about lately except for Al-Zarquawi. I thought you were educated in world politics and the military but you have proven me wrong. Anyone with half a brain knows the WMD's found were not what the corrupt administration based their war on Iraq oh I mean terrorism on, terrorism is still the "flavor" of the day for you neocons right? You are a meat head, enroll at your local college and take some poli. sci. courses. You need more experience.

Answer 7

I've searched all the major news sites - Yahoo News, CNN, Fox, AP, Reuters, US News & World Report, Christian Science Monitor - and some not so major and I only found two reporting this story - Fox and Crosswalk.com ("The intersection of faith and life"). If there's any spinning going on, it seems to be by the right-wing press (e.g. Fox) trying to make more out of this than it deserves.

Answer 8

Last night, intelligence officials reaffirmed that the shells were old and were not the suspected weapons of mass destruction sought in Iraq after the 2003 invasion.

Answer 9

Where's your link?

Answer 10

The question is whether they could have been fired at us. And now that Bush has said that there were were no WMD's, he's in the same boat as the liberals.

Answer 11

Old weapons. even the White House admits they are not the WMD they were talking about before the war