Who owes George W. Bush an apology?

Question

Don't make me go through all my old posts, and name you out one by one. Just stand up, and be a man/ woman, and apologize for calling him a liar.

In case you don't know what I am talking about, 500 Weapons of Mass Destuction (which saddam said he had destroyed) were found today.

its breaking news, no link, just on T.V. right now.

Answer 1

I've always fully supported President Bush. I'm a Soldier and I'm proud to have served in Operation Iraqi Freedom.

Oh yeah, BantamRooster68 you're absolutely right man, the liberals don't have the integrity to admit that they were wrong. Sad that you can't instill some moral values in people like that.

Answer 2

For what? preventing mass homicide? preventing the rapes? liberating little ones from penitentiary? Did the U. S. make some mistakes in Iraqi, definite. we choose a lot more advantageous troops on the floor at the initiating. yet Saddam became put in capacity through the U. S. would not that make the U. S. a minimum of partly to blame for what he did? if so then we owe an apology for that, and for no longer moving into faster. yet Saddam's getting into capacity did not ensue on his watch. Did we've some duty to freshen up our mess in an attempt to talk. definite. And after Saddam violated distinctive UN mandates, and it regarded like the UN became satisfied adequate to allow the mass homicide, the rape, the jailing of little ones, see you later as some contributors of the UN made funds off the deal. obviously something had to be done. a range of of human beings contained in the U. S. besides experience that UN isn't something more advantageous then a ***** consultation besides and doesn’t have any genuine capacity with out the U. S. backing it up. there's a large crew(s) of folk who pick the U. S. to tug out of the UN. after all it type of feels that the first element the UN does each and each and every time is a subject matter is to blame the U. S.. We both aren’t doing adequate, or we must be minding our own agency. both way we are the undesirable guy. I see I’m starting off to bypass off subject matter so I’ll end now. after all it really is purely my opinion.

Answer 3

The U.S. military announced in 2004 in Iraq that several crates of the old shells had been uncovered and that they contained a blister agent that was no longer active. Neither the military nor the White House nor the CIA considered the shells to be evidence of what was alleged by the Bush administration to be a current Iraqi program to make chemical, biological and nuclear weapons.

Last night, intelligence officials reaffirmed that the shells were old and were not the suspected weapons of mass destruction sought in Iraq after the 2003 invasion.

Answer 4

WASHINGTON — The United States has found 500 chemical weapons in Iraq since 2003, and more weapons of mass destruction are likely to be uncovered, two Republican lawmakers said Wednesday.

The key word is since...why has this information been hidden since 2003? It would certainly have saved a lot of hatred and useless, unfounded debate. Are you okay with the fact that he, George Bush, may have been lying to us for 3 years?

Answer 5

I'm not going to apologize for anything because here is the REST of the story ON FOX NEWS, the part you conveniently left out.

Offering the OFFICIAL ADMINISTRATION response to FOX News, a senior Defense Department official pointed out that the chemical weapons were not in useable conditions.

"This does NOT reflect a capacity that was built up after 1991," the official said, adding the munitions "ARE NOT the WMDs this country and the rest of the world believed Iraq had, and AND NOT THE WMDs for which this country went to war."
NOT THE WMDs FOR WHICH THIS COUNTRY WENT TO WAR> OFFICIALLY FROM THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION!!!!

OOOPS! You popped your champagne too early pal.

Answer 6

Don't get your panties in a wad, the weapons were found 3 years ago, and the report was declassified today, perhaps you should read the whole story instead of just a headline.

The weapons were degraded to the point of being useless.

The whole thing was pulled off by a couple of Senators trying to look good for the sheep back home, hoping they would not read the details. I guess they were right, your a good example of that behavior.

Answer 7

I see now how the republican news machine works. You conveniently leave out half of the story. That way it is not a lie it is just the consumers fault for not looking into the story thoroughly. That is a very wise strategy since most of FOX news base has a 9 second attention span and could not possibly sit around and listen to the whole story.

Answer 8

Every one of the New American Communists posing as liberal Democratic Party members roaming around on this forum and calling the President of the United States a liar and a criminal and such. Each and every one of them owe him an apology. But I would bet my kingdom that not a one of them has the integrity to do so.

Answer 9

.... dont get too excited son... these were non usable non deliverable weapons. thats number 1 . number 2 , cheney/ bush never gave a damb about any weapons they KNEW could not be delivered to the usa... all they ever wanted was to get their claws in the middle east...wmd was just an excuse that the pitifully sheep of this country bought. even if they had wmd, so what? so did the ussr and plenty of them[ and so do we over 10,000 nuclear war heads] , pointed right at us... answer me this why didnt we go after them, why are so many people fond of saying "Reagen[sp] took down the ussr w/o a shot... why couldn't cheney bush do the same w/ iraq?? answer that to yourself... dont be taken in by what you want to be patriotism. history will bear[sp] this out... they are sinfull villains, nothing less and their followers are misguide. or accomplices
oh and just 1 more thing; why aren't you in the millitary? arent you willing to serve your country in battle? arent you will to die for your vise president ?arent you willing to kill for your gasoline? "nick" show me you realy care go sign up get off this computor and volenteer.....

Answer 10

You got it all wrong dude...
(Once again)

Defense Department says Rick Santorum and FOX News are insane to be claiming that we found WMD in Iraq. Boy, when even Rummy won't back you, you're really a sad Republican.


I hated Bush before
it was cool to hate Bush!