For example, if Saddam Hussein was illegally developing Weapons of Mass Destruction, illegaly buying uranium from Niger, supporting al-Qaeda, etc., then why are none of these charges in his trial? In fact, I haven't seen a single charge of illegal actions related to America. Why should anyone pass up the chance to charge him with all of his crimes, regardless of whether it is on a national or international scale?
2006-06-21
13:50:40
·
5 answers
·
asked by
Kestra SpiritNova
6
in
News & Events
➔ Current Events
Thanks for the replies, and no, I am not an America-hater. I'm sorry if my question seemed to imply that! It was an honest question. So, if the President committed an international crime, the American people couldn't charge him with those crimes? I just wasn't sure how the jurisdiction worked out. It would seem a shame, though, because I think leaders should have to answer for all of their actions when it affects the people of their country.
2006-06-21
14:01:13 ·
update #1