here you go:http://www.woodradio.com/cc-common/mainheadlines2.html?feed=125494&article=527510
the question we should all be asking is: why isn't this on national news sites yet?
2006-06-21 12:44:18 · 9 answers · asked by loubean 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I don't have alot of facts, because I am not the one who reported the story.....from what I read they were chemical weapons, and they were not found recently, but the information is just now being declassified...
this means Bush has known he was right for two years...and still didn't say anything to all of the whining libs to shut them up...that is class, man.
2006-06-21 12:48:20 · update #1
the news article I read on Santorums web page ( I know....he's a Republican) said the weapons have been being found since 2003....I too am waiting for conformation, but I can see that libs will still be set in their "anti-Bush" ways....
2006-06-21 13:04:00 · update #2
If this is not confirmed, or on EVERY news station soon.....I will take it back....
Time will tell.....I have always believed there were WMD's....although by now I thought they were in other countries...
2006-06-21 13:05:46 · update #3
Santorum is supposed to be on Hannity and Colmes discussing this tonight....I know Hannity is a conservative, but Colmes is not.....remember that.
2006-06-21 13:06:46 · update #4
... there doesn't seem to really be any facts about it yet... just people talking about the facts... I don't like that...
Everything you have cited so far is VERY vague... not that it isn't true... I just want more than some quotes about how great it is and a very brief description...
2006-06-21 12:51:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Because ONE politician has made yet another claim that this time, yes this time really, it will be proven that Iraq had WMDs before the war. WHEN the article doesn't say--maybe the document is from 1998 or before. And even if it's not why weren't these weapons found? It's been over three years and nothing has turned up. It's not on the news because wolf can only be cried so much before it is ignored.
You are trying to infer that "LIBRUL HOMOSEKSHUL" media won't publish this because they hate Bush. The real reason is we've heard this story way too many times before. Nothing will come of this. Move on. The rest of the nation has.
2006-06-21 19:53:45 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
here is some more articles for you. the left needs to lie to make their points stick.
was watching the daily show when one of Saddams cabniet minsters admitted that Iraq sent wmds to Syria before the start of the war. it was funny watching Mr. Stewarts jaw hit the ground after asking jim the question about wmds. it is also funny that he still harps on the subject after being told by an Iraq offical. here is the story in the times.
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/25/intern...
http://www.cnn.com/2004/world/meast/10/1...
http://www.frontpagemag.com/articles/rea...
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?arti...
this is from the Daily Show
http://www.exposetheleft.com/2006/03/22/...
the news media has had these facts for years yet the frame the story to make the president look bad.
2006-06-21 21:02:42 · answer #3 · answered by rap1361 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
LouBean, it is. I just saw the story on FoxNews, interesting propaganda. Even Santourm stated the the Mustard and seran gas found have been there since before 1990 and that they weren't a factor in the illegal invasion in Iraq, this coming from FoxNews, If they can't spin it into THE wmd's that Bush based his invasion upon you can't either, sorry, good try tough.
2006-06-21 19:50:15 · answer #4 · answered by Dr.Feelgood 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Loubean you have got to quit smoking that stuff. It is unbecoming of you. If it were true wouldn't you think that the daily news would have reported it. Here is another thought that you won't understand. If Saddam had shitballs to throw at us he would have. What was to stop him he was going down for the rest of the stuff anyway. There was no WMD'S. You were lied to like all the rest of the world.
2006-06-21 19:59:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Remember, Bush said on national TV that America was in imminent danger of Saddam's nuclear capability. The bombs you are referring to are munitions that carry mustard gas. He had no way of sending them over here.
He used them against Iran in their 8 year war, but there was no way he could deliver them here.
We wouldn't have gone to war over mustard gas.
2006-06-21 19:56:00 · answer #6 · answered by Truth 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is another Fox News parrot with NO proof..
EVEN BUSHIE, CONDIE and the corporate media has admitted they werent there..
2006-06-21 19:47:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You really believe this? This should on the news by morning, if not ....think about who you are geting your info from.
2006-06-21 20:02:25 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
sorry don't know
2006-06-21 19:48:39 · answer #9 · answered by idontkno 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋