being immortal and living with cancer, aids and every disease known to man or being immortal and having all your limbs amputated ?
2006-06-21 12:28:49 · 38 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
People, can't I ask stupid, fun questions. Your sooo serious. You must be a fun person!
2006-06-21 12:32:55 · update #1
My soul is dark? Thanks for the insult. lol
2006-06-21 12:34:06 · update #2
Second choice, I am not inmortal but having diabetes and this is taugh enough, imagine all diseases. Without lungs is good enough as you do not like smoking...
2006-06-21 12:31:13 · answer #1 · answered by pedrogolo 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
the worst is being immortal and have all disease known to men. why you may ask because if you have all deceases known to men then you will probably have a decease that will prevent you from moving your arm and legs plus the pain and all that and people would not approach you.
immortal with no limbs. you would not have pain, a people would be able to help live i would guess that in the future they would make things that an in mortal person with limbs can use to get by.
2006-06-21 12:42:32 · answer #2 · answered by ybzcarlos1 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
One of those questions that makes you think? LOL
Well, I would say being immortal and living with every disease known to man is worse, because on top of all the other effects, there are diseases that could render you incapable of using your limbs anyways. So yeah, I'd rather be limb-less and otherwise healthy.
2006-06-21 12:33:33 · answer #3 · answered by OffLiCute 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
**LOL***
living w/ every disease known to man. never know if/when man will ever find a cure. and by that time, the disease may have eaten away more than what technology can replace! And think of the AGONY! Chronic pain can drive anyone (immortal or not) nutty!
eventually technology will replace what ever limbs were amputated.
2006-06-21 12:32:00 · answer #4 · answered by Cassor 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Being immortal with every disease known to man would render one as helpless as being an immortal full-amputee.Imagine how ridiculously disabling all of the symptoms would be. One wouldn't even be able to speak without coughing blood, for example.
2006-06-21 12:32:05 · answer #5 · answered by Mira Bella 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would say being immortal living with cancer/aids and all the other diseases. Cause you actually cough up blood...you get dizzy, and so many other symptoms that I just wouldnt want to have FOREVER.
2006-06-28 04:11:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If i'm going to be immortal, why not diseased and limbless?
Do I at least get to keep my private parts? Just give me a box of stainless steel condoms for whatever fun nights might happen.
By the way Heavy6Metal9Babe, you're right....
no sense of humor for those who answered before me (and some who answer after).
2006-06-21 15:11:44 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Being immortal and living with cancer,aids and every disease.
2006-06-21 12:32:15 · answer #8 · answered by browneyedbeauty4 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Which is worse? Living with the diseases. This isn't really a fun question though. I mean, I understand your just trying to goof off but it might be offensive for those that, say, have cancer or AIDS. They aren't funny topics. Sorry.
-a-
2006-06-29 15:29:25 · answer #9 · answered by [Isaiah born 12/31/09!] 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Living with cancer and every disease is much worse than having no limbs.
2006-06-21 12:32:46 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I will vote for being immortal and having all my limbs amputated.....if you'll allow me to be a snake.
2006-06-21 15:33:08 · answer #11 · answered by missinglincoln 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋