no question about it, Phil Simms. His 22-25 performance in Superbowl XXI is the reason. Until Chris can do something comparable he's in his father's shadow.
2006-06-21 11:29:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by rhin0sb22 1
·
11⤊
2⤋
Phil Simms
2006-06-21 18:20:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by bay_area_steve 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It may be too early to tell, but Phil Simms was pretty good and he did win a Super Bowl, would have been two had he not been injured. Maybe in time Chris will be better, but for now, I will take Phil.
2006-06-21 18:12:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by spudric13 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Chris Simms has the potential to be greater than daddy but Phil wasn't that great anyway. 22 for 25 for 268 yds. in the superbowl is pretty good I got to admit!
2006-06-21 18:44:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by bxchrs13 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, the better quarterback is Phil. Maybe Chris is the better quaterback(whatever that is) LOL
2006-06-21 19:11:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by Ruthinia 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Phil Sims. NO doubt there. Chris was an awesome QB at Texas (my school) but as far as NFL play, he has not shown any expirience. He has major potential, but so does the 8 year old kid down the street. His dad has won big games, made big, clutch plays, and has proven himself. PHIL SIMS BUD.
2006-06-21 18:11:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by rc_longhorn 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
No comparison! Phil is a probowl, superbowl champion player, and the son has yet to even open the year as a starter.
2006-06-21 18:25:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by ikuwaiian 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Chris has a ways to go to catch Dad. If Chris ever gets a ring, come back and re post this question.
2006-06-21 18:18:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by -:¦:-SKY-:¦:- 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Phil - at least he has won a Super Bowl.
2006-06-22 16:22:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Its too early to tell since Chris has not being playing that long. Only time will tell.
2006-06-21 18:10:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋