English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-06-21 10:09:46 · 18 answers · asked by sophie 1 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

18 answers

Yes, but only in conditional statements. For instance: If I am really typing a message to post over the Internet, there must be a me and there must be an Internet.

New evidence is always possible so all proved facts are only proved, provided that my sense of reality is actual. If it is not, and I think it is... then my proved statement is still true because of the if clause's ability to encompass the indicative/proved statement.

This would cause the statement to become a contrary to fact, proven, statement.

2006-06-21 10:20:43 · answer #1 · answered by oneclassicmaiden 3 · 1 0

I can prove that I am not omniscient.

The proof:
If I were omniscient, I would score 100 percent best answers.
My percentage of best answers is only 66 percent.
Therefore, I am either not omniscient, or I actually am omniscient, but I enjoy pretending to be dumber than I actually am.

If you believe that I am actually omniscient, but just pretending to be dumb, then I have some high-yield stock in a tapioca company that I would love to sell you. The proof, as they say, is in the pudding.

2006-06-21 12:32:05 · answer #2 · answered by eroticohio 5 · 0 0

Religion is the perfect justification for tyranny, because it doesn't require an ounce of reason or a shred of proof.
—Anonymous

Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blind-folded fear.
—Thomas Jefferson, 1787

some entertaining quotes for you..


I don't believe it. Prove it to me and I still won't believe it.
—Douglas Adams
Life, the Universe and Everything, 1982


I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.
—Voltaire
paraphrased in The Friends of Voltaire, 1907

Judge a man by his questions rather than his answers.
—Voltaire

2006-06-21 12:16:41 · answer #3 · answered by sparkalittlefire 4 · 0 0

Hi..Some kinds of proof are easier to accept than others... Mathematical proof, for example, is generally accepted as certain... You can demonstrate that" two plus two is four"... Scientific proof is merely considered “highly probable”... You can demonstrate that an experiment works out the same way every time you’ve performed it in the past, but you can’t demonstrate that it will continue to work out that way every time you perform it in the future... In science, there’s always room for doubt; so, you can’t ever really say something’s scientifically true for absolute certain.... :) ..
Kind regards!:)

2006-06-21 14:15:14 · answer #4 · answered by Kimberly 6 · 0 0

if you want to you can prove anything to yourself, to prove some thing to the puclic you need all the research and proof you can get. even then there are some people i call douters that well do anything to dout you will never get through their thick boneheads. why? because they choose not to believe anyoneor anything.

2006-06-21 10:33:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

why do u doubt?i recently proved to the world im a man!

2006-06-21 10:21:59 · answer #6 · answered by chris 3 · 0 0

I can prove that all of my children came from within me - have pix of some to prove it.

2006-06-21 10:15:40 · answer #7 · answered by Holiday Magic 7 · 0 0

proof is just a parlor trick, it's actions based on beliefs that are important. Previous answerer believes she exists and that she can post on an extant internet, then she does so.

2006-06-21 10:27:36 · answer #8 · answered by P F 2 · 0 0

Only if you can prove your question.

2006-06-21 10:16:32 · answer #9 · answered by Aritmentor 5 · 0 0

Too much subjective reality, hmmm? Just finish a Descartes lecture?
How's this: No, no you can't. You can only act and offer your actions as proof. What they mean, well.... that's another subject...

2006-06-21 10:17:16 · answer #10 · answered by diasporas 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers