sex-offender database,he remarries a woman with a child( the same age as the child assaulted), that he should be allowed to help raise that child? Keep in mind that the childs' natural father wants custody and this offender IS NOT allowed to have any contact with his own children.
2006-06-21 07:54:24 · 17 answers · asked by wilburkee 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Absolutely not. That man is legally not allowed to raise children. Why is one person's child any different than this mans own kids? If I were the biological father, I would call BILL O'REILLY from Fox News. Child predators are one of his biggest "things" and he absolutely lives to protect children. He would take this case up in a heartbeat and take it to the national stage.
2006-06-21 08:02:29 · answer #1 · answered by Goose&Tonic 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
CALL THE POLICE IMMEDIATELY!
Get him away from the child and if the mother married the sex offender, then she should lose ALL rights to the child. They make it a law for a person not to have contact with any children for a reason. Because that is what he likes and can't help but touch. Also, do you honestly think that he loves the woman or just wants the child?
2006-06-21 08:00:48 · answer #2 · answered by brittme 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No I don't think he should be able to help raise a child...I believe in once a predator ALWAYS a predator...NOTHING will chance that...what's to say he won't try to hurt the child of the woman he marries?? What to say he won't do it again??? what's to stop him from doing it again. If that woman had half a brain in her head she WOULD NOT have married a man...especially if she knew that he was a registered sex offender...a MOTHER putting her CHILD is risk needs her head examined. I would NEVER put my children at risk like that...that's just WRONG on so many different levels.
2006-06-21 07:58:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are no laws prohibiting him from helping raise that child since he married the mother BUT the child's father should be able to win custody based on this.
2006-06-21 08:01:52 · answer #4 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Im a resister sex offender it depend on what the court said however in my case I am allowed to see my children
in this case the sex offender need to stright out his life BEFORE he can start a relationship with anybody that is in my opion
but he have the right to start a healthy relationship with anybody as much as the other does.
I have refer this question to our sex offender support group
if you know or want to know more about our sex offender group
and no we do NOT go around discussing how to kidnap the next kids.
some of us are married and have children of our own.
some of us have children that are sex offender from a boyfriend/girlfriend relationship and so on.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/roar_4_freedom/
2006-06-21 08:30:13 · answer #5 · answered by nk_rso 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely not the mother should never put her child at risk, and the offender probably has conditions that prevent them from being around minor children look into this
2006-06-21 08:00:12 · answer #6 · answered by Evan C 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
u examine my innovations u might desire to run for place of work. have faith or no longer state legisltive right here in vt and is same crap someplace else voted down 25yrs-existence for those that rape young ones below 12. What Dummies the only reeason to vote it down isn't adequate time and that became no longer they have been questioning if u can call coddling monters questioning. To be honest There are intercourse offenders who did dumb stuff like grab a ladies butt or a 17yr old who slept with 16yr old who should not be thrown away like the rapists and moletsters and that desires to be adressed to boot Oh and the prisons are crammed with particularly risky potheads who're alot smarter then maximum judges and lawmakers
2016-12-08 23:39:12 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
not all sex-offenders are sex-offenders due to mental instability...some are just perverts....who CAN change....i'm not saying they all do, but unless they are properly diagnosed with a mental problem that has them seeking for children, then they CAN change.....i don't believe in the sex offender's database....it punishes a person for the rest of their life for doing something wrong....there's a lot of jobs they can't get....a lot of places they can't live....it's totally devastating....so if someone who has sexually assaulted a minor is able to be rehabilitated, then i see nothing wrong with them being able to start their life anew and remarry and care for a child.....we all make mistakes people...
2006-06-21 08:05:16 · answer #8 · answered by egyptsprincess07 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You should raise this issue in the court and claim best interests of the child to gain sole custody. Get a good lawyer and make it happen.
2006-06-21 07:59:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The man has proven he can't be around children. He should not be allowed to live with a child, for his own protection also. He has a problem.
2006-06-21 07:58:03 · answer #10 · answered by weswe 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋