English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-06-21 07:27:22 · 10 answers · asked by graffeng 1 in Arts & Humanities History

10 answers

It was a victory of production. Despite huge losses in the first months of the war, despite mass dislocations of population and the German occupation of many of the country's key manufacturing centers, Soviet industry managed to build tanks, artillery, and aircraft that were technologically a match for Germany's weapons, and to do so at a rate that consistently exceeded anything their opponents thought was possible.

Indeed, the decisive German defeats at Stalingrad and Kursk came about precisely because the Germans launched offensives against what they imagined to be a weaker opponent, and were taken by surprise when counterattacked by thousands of tanks whose existence they had never suspected.

Soviet design & production were simple and focused on few models, unlike the multiple designs of German tanks which diluted their resource unnecessarily.

2006-06-21 07:45:16 · answer #1 · answered by Its not me Its u 7 · 3 1

The Russians have been good at many things for a very long time. Remember it was the Russians who eventually defeated the Mongols.

Read about Stalingrad and Leningrad during WWII to to understand why the Russians defeated the Germans.
Willpower is a powerful force.

The Russians were fighting for their very lives. The Germans were fighting for an evil ideal. There is a good chance that had the Germans won they may have exterminated or at the least certainly killed the men of Russia.

It's the same reason the Germans could not get a useable nuclear weapon before the War ended. They were sabotaged by their own scientist. Right always wins in the end.

2006-06-21 17:10:22 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

The T-34 replace right into a wonderful tank in many procedures. even yet it truly is not seen the main suitable. It had sturdy, sloped armor and a respectable gun. even yet it replace into crude and unrefined in some procedures. The German Panther replace into outfitted as an instantaneous reaction to the T-34, and the Panther is often seen the main suitable over all tank of the conflict. The Tiger replace right into a sturdy heavy tank, even yet it replace right into somewhat slow, and the thick armor replace into a minimum of partly conquer with extra clever weapons. The King Tiger replace into an progression, even yet it suffered from some reliability subjects. So, over each and all of the Panther is the main suitable, with the T-34 being 2nd. After that the sector gets somewhat muddled with the aid of actual characteristics of the tanks. i could say third could be a tie between the King Tiger and the Sherman, for thoroughly distinctive motives of direction.

2016-10-31 06:09:28 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

One of the key advantages of the Russian tanks was their sloping armor design that tended to deflect the force of blasts. Another was the use of diesel engines as the fuel was much harder to ignite if the engine cavity was penetrated. Still another is that the Russians have enjoyed a long history of metallurgical innovation.

2006-06-21 09:24:23 · answer #4 · answered by anonymourati 5 · 0 0

When they did badly in some previous wars, they realized they needed to update their battle tactics. in the Russo-Japaneese War, the Russians were still using wooden ships while the japanesse were using Iron Side ships that moved faster and were better equipped. So they found information where they could and created moddern weapons of war.

2006-06-21 07:49:31 · answer #5 · answered by Dr. Psychosis 4 · 0 0

They weren't there tanks sucked and so did ours. But both of us could build a lot more of them. the Germans built the best tanks in the world at that time.

2006-06-21 07:43:48 · answer #6 · answered by firecoonbiz 1 · 0 0

Necessity! The German tanks were superior in many ways, but the Soviet tanks were also good, brilliantly simple, and quick and cheap to build.

2006-06-21 07:30:05 · answer #7 · answered by aboukir200 5 · 0 0

Because it was important to their government to have the best tanks. They did what they thought they had to do. So did the Americans, Germans and British.

2006-06-21 07:32:43 · answer #8 · answered by Scott R 3 · 0 0

Fast. Cheap. Effective.

2006-06-21 07:30:37 · answer #9 · answered by dj92jr 2 · 0 0

they themselves r huge like tanks....just kidding!!

2006-06-21 07:32:24 · answer #10 · answered by babloo 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers