Hey Bush and fellow Repuglicons...why don't you?

Question

Lie us out of Bush's war on the Iraqi citizens?

Answer 1

I think that it is a lack of a normal sex life that makes them like they are. They are only allowed sex once a month and then only in the missionary position for procreational purposes only. That is why they were so mad at Clinton for getting a hummer in the oval office. Jealousy is a terrible emotion.

Answer 2

What the hell, are you asking? Bush had the same information, that everyone in congress had. Don't you remember, that 98% of the congress gave him the powers, to go to war..Do you think Bush did it on his own..You had better learn your history, before you make allegations, against the President of the United State
s! He has to get the go ahead of congress, before he can take any action..What do you measn, BUSH'S war. This is the war of the congress, and all the libs voted to give him the go ahead, to invade Iraq. You better pray, that we do not loose this war, or would you like to live under the crap that the radical muslims, are trying to force on the US?? Not a hard one, to answer.Do you enjoy all the freedoms we enjoy, in this country? I would like to keep it like that, or I would not even be able to answer your question, under a radical muslim regime..

Answer 3

We are not waging war against Iraqi citizens...the war is against terrorist.
If President Clinton had taken care of Saddam, maybe our troops would not be in Iraq. At least we have a president unafraid to take the war to them... instead of waiting for another 9/11 to come to the USA.

Remember, everyone believed Iraq had WMD's.... and I still do.

Please note the first five entries were made PRIOR to President Bush becoming our president.... and then, we have Hiliary's entry!


"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998.

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998.

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998.

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998.

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

NOW THE DEMOCRATS SAY PRESIDENT BUSH LIED, THAT THERE NEVER WERE ANY WMD'S AND HE TOOK US TO WAR FOR HIS OIL BUDDIES??? Right!!!

Answer 4

man republican idiots like the the ones here are in complete denial. your stupid leader is creating more and more terrorists everyday. You two numb nuts can't realize that your blissful ignorance is making you look completely stupid and that you're part of the American red-neck stereotype that the US is all about war and their "strong Christian values". If only there was a mirror to show you how completely and utterly ridiculous you truly are.

Answer 5

I don't think anyone understands your question. If you are saying we should intentionally mislead people in order to get the US out of the Iraq conflict, I believe they won't do that. I think they won't do it because it would be morally wrong.

I don't believe Bush intentionally lied. I think he relayed the best information we had at the time.

Answer 6

They are already doing that. I mean didn't it start as WMDs, then it was.. and ended up.. I think the latest is liberation. No wait, I heard yesterday, 'fighting for the American way.' LOL I can't keep up because the reasons for this war keep changing.

Answer 7

What's another lie? Your question makes sense to me & I'm
sure another lie would just be part of the norm for the conserves,
who still follow him.

Answerman - I love you

Answer 8

I'm sure that's what Bush's inner circle talks about at night, that is after he has sex with Condi Rice and/or Mr. Gannon. LOL!

Answer 9

We Republicans haven't learned to lie like you democraps.

Answer 10

Why dont you shut up and realize this war is about more than what we are being told?