English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Last week at a WH press briefing, Snow was asked for a reaction to the death toll for U.S. troops in Iraq reaching 2,500. Snow responded: “It’s a number.”

YOUR REPUGLICON MOUTHPIECE SAID AT HIS
PRESS BRIEFINGS...
DEATH TOLL FOR US TROOPS...
ITS A NUMBER....

AND YET THEY GO ALL RABID WHEN
I REMIND THEM OF THEIR DEATH
NUMBER SYSTEM...WHY?

SOON IT WILL BE US TROOP #2508

WHAT NUMBER WILL THE REPUGLICONS
SAY ENOUGH IS ENOUGH?

US TROOP NUMBER 30,000?

2006-06-21 07:17:14 · 15 answers · asked by BUSH IS A CLOWN 2 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

15 answers

They don't care!
They didn't care when the current Admin. killed 3000 Americans on 9/11, and they definitely don't care about expendable soldiers!

2006-06-21 07:21:05 · answer #1 · answered by USA Patriot 1 · 0 0

Many Republicans disagree with the war in Iraq at this point. Congress and the President decide when the troops come home. 2500 is just a number. There was a death at 2499 and will be at 2501. Each death or maiming is a horrible horrible thing. At the point Congress decides we should pull the last of our troops, I have no idea how many casualties we will have suffered. However, i think at this point, the administration and Congress believe it is worth the price to stay.

Does that answer your question?

2006-06-21 14:24:12 · answer #2 · answered by wordofgods 2 · 0 0

We mourn every death in this battle. War is hell. War should be avoided.

Tony Snow doesn't want to denigrate individual lives with a callous body count.

However, since we are engaged in this one, we cannot act irresponsibly at just cut and run. Chaos would ensue. Iran would probably make disorganized Iraq its puppet state, and control half the Mideast oil.

The U.S. Civil War cost 560,000 lives, a full 9% of the population. Was it worth it?

2006-06-21 14:22:01 · answer #3 · answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7 · 0 0

Nobody's getting mad. You're lying. Creating a false conclusion to something that isn't happening. You're delusional on top of ignorant. Not a good combination, pal.

You took Snow's comment out of context. You took three words out of a one hundred word paragraph. But of course you know this.

Come back when you're something truthful and honest to post. Guess that means you're gone till next year.

2006-06-21 14:29:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Repuglicans have no sense of humor, I think it is a lack of a quality sex life that causes this. They are only allowed sex once a month in the missionary position, and then only for procreational purposes only. That is why they were so upset about Clinton getting a hummer in the oval office.

2006-06-21 14:22:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

They can't handle the truth. Give them time.. I think some are beginning to come around and see what is what. There will always be ones who are going to believe what they are going to believe no matter what true facts you show them though.

It's pretty hard to hang on to faith in a civilized world in times like these.

2006-06-21 14:22:27 · answer #6 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 0 0

The last war with that many deaths was started by a democrap.

2006-06-21 16:59:53 · answer #7 · answered by RockHunter 7 · 0 0

Republicans could care less about the dead! They are just the price paid for some oil. and to them, since they don't send their sons and daughters to war, they are just a number.

2006-06-21 14:21:21 · answer #8 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0 0

well, during war sldiers life is assume by the people in the war front as not important, but let them too go to the war front and we can say is no figure, let assume queen elizabeth son his killede , then the war will be stop , automatically

2006-06-21 14:50:24 · answer #9 · answered by aliajao 5 · 0 0

Actually, I think they're more pissed off about the term, Repuglicons. Real cute there Mr. Agenda man. Do me a favor. Quit promoting the liberal agenda. We other liberals are pissed at you for making us look stupid.

2006-06-21 14:23:35 · answer #10 · answered by Miss Red 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers