Freddy is definitely the best. Paul is a talented person by far but he is no replacement for Freddy. No one is but I thought they should have gotten someone a little more flamboyant.
2006-06-21 07:15:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by JENNLUPE 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Freddie Mercury
2006-06-21 07:14:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by rozzi 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Definitely Freddie Mercury!
2006-06-21 07:14:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by phnowner 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Freddie Mercury by a long shot.
2006-06-21 07:26:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Freddie Mercury. Can't go wrong with classic Queen!
2006-06-21 07:15:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by Chris F 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is like comparing a Big Mac with Fillet Mignon. Freddie Mercury was too talented and too original to take a back seat to anyone. paul Rogers is a great singer, but you cannot compare the two.
2006-06-21 07:17:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by williejuly1 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Freddy Mercury was a much better showman by far, and had a greater singing range.
2006-06-21 07:15:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by tsopolly 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Paul
2006-06-21 07:15:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by just_ice 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
freddie mercury
2006-06-21 07:14:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by navymilitarybrat76 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
MERCURY! Obviously. No comparison!
2006-06-21 07:14:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by cruachanmusic 3
·
0⤊
0⤋