2006-06-21 06:46:17 · 7 answers · asked by anthonyasm123 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Biology
No. Most life forms did not evolve from plants. Simple single-celled life was first, microscopic organisms at one point called protists and at another point moved into its own kingdom, bacteria. The first primitive multicellular animals preceeded plants by a few million years.
2006-06-21 16:38:07 · answer #1 · answered by Professor Armitage 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This question is not coherent , its badly thought out and poorly phrased .When your asking questions about such major issues , you must at least attempt to form a proper question .
the word 'slave' does not really fit in with a scientific approach.
2006-06-21 13:56:29 · answer #2 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i don't even understand what you are trying to ask here; next time phrase the question in a correct and understandable way please. Also, why are there quotes around life? you mean fake life? which therefore would not be alive, and therefore could not have evolved from anything....
2006-06-21 14:56:08 · answer #3 · answered by Jen 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My bio prof referred to the course as, "the study of plants and their parasites." I think slave might be a little strong.
2006-06-21 14:39:45 · answer #4 · answered by Schmorgen 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
what the...? uh...are you asking if all life evolved from plants? no. but your question might have: Cannabis sativa
2006-06-21 14:10:02 · answer #5 · answered by jamie 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO, but a serious note...if you are growing leaves on your body go see your doctor.
2006-06-28 12:09:13 · answer #6 · answered by annonymous 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well........ most likely
2006-06-21 13:49:29 · answer #7 · answered by shadow_93008 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋