It's not to do so much with the useful function; rather how the symetry arises. Each organisn arises from a single cell. The clump of cells becomes a ball, that then flatens out and develops a neural tube (becoming the spine and brain complex). From that, everything fans out. as the neural tube forms by a symetrical folding, so all things from it are symetrical as a mirror image forms or each part.
2006-06-21 12:20:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by eucharisto_deo 2
·
7⤊
1⤋
Great question.
Perhaps based on Caos theory, everything respect somekind of symetric shapes but they can appear assymetric. Paterns are created base on it.
Perhaps we have locomotion issues if we take an body assymetric and they were cutted during evolution process. We have radial symetric format what put down our cells division in pairs (Or radial is just an coincidence about the shape and our cells division in paris would determine pour final symetry.
Patern recognize standard can happen too with assymetric standards.
About internal organs, we can just adjust it based on evolution and when we start to "acquire" our internal organs, but our appearence is based in mirroring.
No answer and thanks by it. Something that I need look for.
I believe this answer is in mathematics.
2006-06-22 06:38:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by carlos_frohlich 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
1) Symetry is more simple to produce from a developmental standpoint. Assymetry requires more genetic information and more things could potentially go wrong.
2) Symetry makes locomotion much easier. Asymetry requires more complex motion patterns and therefore more complex nervous systems.
Unless the asymetry produces a reproductive advantage it just simpler for an organism to develop symetrically.
2006-06-21 13:28:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by deadstick325 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It just happens to come out that way. The embryos start out as a single cell and then divide many times, which is a geometric pattern, so it is easier and much more likely that the animals will be symmetrical, except, of course, for necessary exceptions.
2006-06-21 20:56:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by chamrajnagar3 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
balance, for one.
Animals are externally symmetrical, but the arrangement of their internal organs is not. One lung is larger than the other to make room for the heart, which is off to the left. The stomach and liver are off the sides. We favor either right or left. Brain function is different in the two halves, et cetera.
2006-06-21 13:00:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by Hal H 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The three-legged sloth and one-footed armadillo aren't
2006-06-21 13:00:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by wherethewalliscracked 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Best option for moving.
2006-06-22 14:41:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
ditto what hal has said...there are entire disciplines dedicated to this issue...if you truly find it interesting...you may have found yourself a path to follow
2006-06-21 13:06:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by Tessie 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
To keep them balanced?
2006-06-21 13:00:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by TAFF 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
balance, beauty, and think about it, most humans aren't, so someone has to be
2006-06-21 13:10:06
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋