There is nothing I hate most than seeing a CHEAT get away with it and nothing more GRATIFYING than seeing a cheat NOT get away with it. That is why I am an advocate of CAMERAS being used in football to decide such things. Fortunately the referee was near and saw that cheat and sent him off. WHAT A DIVE !! That the Mexicans needed to cheat to win against a Portugal side composed only of SUBSTITUTES as the Portugal FIVE stars, yes five of them, did not play because they were on yellow cards!! ?? My question is this... Do you think cameras should be introduced to football to decide such things as dives, ie cheating, wrongly given penalties, etc ????
2006-06-21 05:54:36 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football ➔ FIFA World Cup (TM)
I personally would MUCH prefer to have cameras than to have bad decisions going in my favour !!! If the fun of football is cheating and dives and bad decision, then I don't think I like football anymore
2006-06-21 06:12:45 · update #1
I agree with "smartmex04" below... there whouldn't be any cameras in matches otherwise there wouldn't be any mexicans today left for Portugal to play with, LOLOLOLOLLL
2006-06-21 06:28:54 · update #2
YES!!!! They won yet again! Forca Portugal!!!!
Sorry I just had to say that!
But about your questions on cameras. I think cameras shouldn't be used that way, I'm not trying to sound bad or anything, but the referee is only human, hopely not biased for anyone's case!! If he makes a mistake then he makes it. And sometimes his wrong mistakes can help the other team.
Jeez I don't sound Joga Bonito at al!!
I'm so ashamed :(
2006-06-21 09:12:13 · answer #1 · answered by virgo91 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
What the hell are you talking about?Mexico's players got the idea of diving from the Portugese players.When Portugal lost the ball their players fell to the floor right away and the ref called it THEIR way.Mexico only did what Potugal was doing.
As for cameras,there shouldnt be any,takes away the excitement and as one of the people above said,"the spice"
2006-06-21 06:16:50 · answer #2 · answered by smartmex04 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes i agree with cameras being used. Fonseca got away with a few dives to. I don't know why Marquez was not given a yellow card for the hand ball along with the penalty.
2006-06-21 06:16:23 · answer #3 · answered by John J 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you want camera so badly..go and watch rugby..
in soccer, camera use is not a good idea..as it would disrupt the flow of the game..unlike rugby which always have pause..anybody agree?
2006-06-21 06:25:04 · answer #4 · answered by -curbside- 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no. they would kind of take something away from the game. i mean refs making bad calls is one of the best aspects of soccer. sometimes the bad calls go your way and you are happy that there are no cameras.
2006-06-21 05:59:25 · answer #5 · answered by striker23 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you're nuts, Mexico could have beaten Portugal, and the ref didn't see a penalty in favor of Mexico...
2006-06-21 08:43:24 · answer #6 · answered by toing 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Those tricky decisions spice up football
2006-06-21 06:12:02 · answer #7 · answered by Carla 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋