Illegal Immigration- Bush has been very very weak on protecting our borders
best thing I like- Iraqi war. Iraq needed to be liberated from that phycotic dictator and those islamic-fanatics.
2006-06-21 05:45:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
It is really the people behind im, telling him what to do that I hate.
It is obvious why, really. They lied, lied and lied and again. Well, maybe lying is a little harsh. They truth-bent. Badly.
Some examples for nicolasraage:
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Rumsfeld
RAY McGOVERN: And so, I would like to ask you to be up front with the American people. Why did you lie to get us into a war that was not necessary and that has caused these kinds of casualties? Why?
DONALD RUMSFELD: Well, first of all, I haven’t lied. I did not lie then. Colin Powell didn't lie. He spent weeks and weeks with the Central Intelligence Agency people and prepared a presentation that I know he believed was accurate, and he presented that to the United Nations. The President spent weeks and weeks with the Central Intelligence people, and he went to the American people and made a presentation. I'm not in the intelligence business. They gave the world their honest opinion. It appears that there were not weapons of mass destruction there.
RAY McGOVERN: You said you knew where they were?
DONALD RUMSFELD: I did not. I said I knew where suspect sites were, and we were --
RAY McGOVERN: You said you knew where they were, “near Tikrit, near Baghdad, and northeast, south and west of there.” Those were your words. (McGovern was quoting a 2003 Rumsfeld appearance on ABC‘s This Week. Rumsfeld's original remarks in his 2003 ABC appearance included the following addition:
I would also add, we saw from the air that there were dozens of trucks that went into that facility after the existence of it became public in the press and they moved things out. They dispersed them and took them away. So there may be nothing left. I don't know that. But it's way too soon to know. The exploitation is just starting.
MORE LIES:
Source: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,192069,00.html
President Bush, in videotaped comments that have been widely broadcast, told the public that we were not spying on Americans without a search warrant. That, of course, turned out to be totally false when the New York Times disclosed that the president had authorized a special program bypassing the law requiring search warrants even in the case of national security.
Then there was the widely publicized presidential statement about the CIA leak investigation when he told the press that he would not tolerate leaking of classified material (the identify of CIA agent Valerie Plame) and would punish anyone found to be involved in such a leak. It turns out that Vice President Cheney and President Bush himself authorized the leaking of previously classified material in an effort to discredit the contention of Plame’s husband former Ambassador Joe Wilson’s that Saddam Hussein had not attempted to buy “yellow cake” from the country of Niger as stated by President Bush.
And then there was the report in the April 12 Washington Post that the Bush administration had irrefutable intelligence that Saddam Hussein did not have mobile biological weapons labs two days before the president said in 2003 that we had uncovered proof that such labs existed. The White House claims the President had sufficient intelligence to make this claim which they now admit turned out to be false.
AND SOME TRUTH-DODGING:
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Rumsfeld
"Reports that say that something hasn't happened are always interesting to me, because as we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns - the ones we don't know we don't know."
-Donald Rumsfeld
2006-06-21 14:04:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mac Guru 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
the man is incapable of a single rational thought and is completely delusional.HIS education in the basics of reading writing and arithmetic must be lacking severely in that he spends more money then he takes in and deficite spend is harmfull to all rational people when there is nothing to gain like the war.WE lost 3000people and 200 billion in property and a slowed econemy.wehave spent 10 times that much trying to prevent it from happening again its like being stung by a wasp and going on a billion dollar program to rid the world of wasps.never realizing that there are bees and misquitos and other bitting animals and insects everywhere and the way to avoid being stung is to avoid the areas the nest in or live.if you want honey be more like the bear learn you will get stung alot for trying to get the honey but if you kill all the bees you will have no more honey.
SO bush is a moron plain and simple all ytou have to do is open your eyes and anyone who is not blind can see this.
please point out that you are so smart and i can not even use the spell check and i am a godless evil person because you are full of hate and ignorance ifeel sorry for you
2006-06-21 12:52:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by playtoofast 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
You want a serious answer? Then ask questions about people who can be taken seriously..
Seriously though... you need to check your grammer. What does "I that is what most of you will say, but please don't" mean. If you know the answer you will get why did you post it here and lose 5 points? Just like W, go to any length to get the point across...
You know a story about this monkey, who was elected King by his people and was given a sword (power in W's case). He died the next day because he used the sword to kill a fly that landed on his face....
Moral of the story? Just because you are given power don't use it without using your brain..Poor W never heard this story growing up with the Saudis.
2006-06-21 19:17:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, since you asked. There are several reasons. And picking just one is kinda hard. So let us go with his healthcare/Social Security program. One that my mom has been on since 1997. She had an accident where she worked and hasn't been able to work since. She was getting enough money from SS/Disability to live comfortably. She could afford to buy the medications she needs. But now, under Bush, I had to move her in with me. She gets $550 a month. She used to get close to $1200 a month. Her meds run her over $150. And that's with medicare. Prior to that bill getting passed she paid only $27 out of pocket for her meds. And now...Well...And it's not just her. I've stood in line to get her meds and have listened to a lot of elderly persons complaining about the rising costs od their medications. I've even gone into my own pocket and helped them out when they didn't have enough. Which is probably a lot more than I can say for you and yours isn't it? You slobbering Bush c0ck suckers.
2006-06-21 13:14:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by darkemoregan 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Starting the Iraq war is one reason. We had no business meddling over there. During the Gulf war Saddam Hussein had demonstrated he couldn't beat an army of ants and couldn't deliver a missile over a fence. He was no threat to us ergo we should leave that country alone.
Instead we are pouring billions of dollars into a country that hates us and thousands of people have been killed and the world considers us war mongers.
I have another thirty or so reasons I don't like him but you said "one" so I will drop it there.
2006-06-21 12:41:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because I feel that he let Rumsfeld and Cheney persuade him into a meaningless war in Iraq instead of finding the person who actually was responsible for the deaths of 5 of my friends who were on the first plane to hit the WTC on 9/11.
2006-06-21 12:39:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by Pitchow! 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The number One reason I do not like President bush is because all he wants to do is start a war to see if he can win. It seems he doesn't care you gets hurt or killed over it. It's all about making a name for himself.
2006-06-21 12:43:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
During the Election, he was prezzi, and he refused to sign a EchoTreaty. We might have a better chance to fight Global Warming if he did sign it. Also, he pointlessly started the stupid war in Iraq. Many innocent women, children, even younger and older men are being killed because of something they originally had absolutetly nothing to do with.
2006-06-21 12:45:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by spacer9182 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
His family makes a lot more money from their associations with the BinLaden family than they could ever make in America. He is supposed to be working for America and I believe that he is just looking out for their own so I think he is a conflict of interest. He strikes me as the shmuck that we all went to college with that was oh so witty, never did any work and still managed to graduate with a 3.5 (of course it had nothing to do with their money).
2006-06-21 12:42:29
·
answer #10
·
answered by writer1055 3
·
0⤊
0⤋