No. Its your responsibility. The problems of the world can be traced to overpopulation. Have 2.4 children, then wrap it.
2006-06-21 04:27:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by tex 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Contraception is morally wrong because it goes against love. A culture of contraception is a culture which destroys love. Man and woman, in marriage, were made to express their love for one another. Love is a gift of oneself to the other. In sexual love, if that love is true and real, it must always be open to the possibility of being fruitful (children). If you have sexual relations with your spouse but close yourself off to the possibility of having "fruits" of that love, then you are not respecting your body. Contraception is ultimately a lack of respect for the human body and for the dignity and nobility of human love. If you would like to learn more about this, I would encourage you to read Pope John Paul II's writings on this subject. He shows why contraception is wrong and how it comes from and leads to a culture of death instead of one of life.
2006-06-25 18:33:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by uiogdpm 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, I don't think so. In fact, contraception may actually be a good thing, so long as it's not government-imposed (as it is in China). We already have 7 billion+ people on this planet. Its resources are being wasted fairly quickly. We need less humans, if we can, to let us go on for awhile.
tex: very nice LOL :-D
2006-06-21 04:28:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by ibkidd37 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
NO IT IS NOT AND DON"T LET ANYONE TELL YOU OTHERWISE
THESE CHRISTIANS SAY CONTRACEPTION IS MORALLY WRONG, BUT THEN WHEN A UNPLANNED PREGNANCY HAPPENS THEY SAY DON'T GET AN ABORTION, THEN WHEN THE WOMAN HAS THE BABY AND SHE GOES ON WELFARE THEY COMPLAIN THAT THEY DON'T WANT TO PAY FOR IT...
NOT EVERYONE WAITS UNTIL MARRIAGE FOR SEX, AND IT WILL NEVER EVER HAPPEN. AS LONG AS THERE ARE PEOPLE ON THIS PLANET THERE WILL BE PREMARITAL SEX..WHEN A WOMAN LOOSES CONTROL OF HER FERTILITY SHE LOOSES CONTROL OF HER LIFE...
2006-06-21 04:28:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by A Dizzle 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
No but I do think it's morally wrong for people to keep having babies that they can't take care of.
2006-06-21 04:42:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mollywobbles 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
I couldn't agree more with A Dizzle. She has it short, sweet and to the point. It is NOT MORALLY WRONG for all the moral reasons she gave.
2006-06-21 04:44:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by voodoobarbie 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
No, as long as the sexual relations are between two married people and does not destroy an already conceived life. If the conception itself is prevented, that is a matter of personal choice as to the method.
2006-06-21 04:28:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
No, it's better than having an unwanted child.
2006-06-21 04:39:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by bad_bob_69 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
No, but forced pregnancy certainly is!
2006-06-21 06:38:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
your an idiot!!!
2006-06-21 04:28:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by lastofodyinbreed 4
·
0⤊
1⤋