What scientific proofs back up Darwin's Evolution?

Answer 1

There is NONE! Everything he wrote was thought up! - And proven WRONG! Also - have you ever seen the title of his book, The Origin of Species? The actual title is: Ther Origin of Species by means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favoured RACES in the Struggle for Life
Darwin hated Black people, and any body that wasnt his "race". He ended up marrying his 1st cousin becausehe wanted to make a superior race(every one else is stupid). What ended up happening was all his kids ended dead or seariously retarded. And it was his book that gave the idea to Karl Marx for communism!
So there has NEVER been any proof for evolution! Every thing in museums that is based on evolution is a lie! Why don't you ask about the skull links in the Smithsonian! Nothinbg for evolution has been proven! It is purely religion!

Answer 2

DARWIN DID NOT DIE AS A CHRISTIAN!

Geesh, that's an easily dispelled myth.

AND THE PEPPERED MOTH DATA WAS FAKED!

Another myth that's been debunked.

Most hard evidence for evolution (Piltdown Man, embryonic recapitulation, pepper moths) was faked.

There is little evidence to support macro-evolution, that is the origin of species. Some bacteria "evolve" into other species of bacteria, but that's about it. And that doesn't really explain the origin of all life.

The main arguments are the taxonomical record and computer modeling. Neither is definitive, and both are subject to much interpretation. The former has a dearth of data supporting it.

Current evolutionary theory is this generation's "phlogiston". The support for it resembles alchemy, not empirical science.

Answer 3

Evolution at a molecular and cellular level can be observed in lab experiments. Its not that hard.

Experiments like this are hard to do on wild populations, and evolution on this scale operates over much longer time periods. So evidence of evolution is sought instead, and there is an unbelievably large amount.

This is like looking at forensic evidence after a crime. Just because you did not see the crime and do not know how to interpret or understand the evidence does not mean the crime did not occur or that you are free to come to your own conclusions about who did it.

Unless, of course, you are an arrogant, ignorant religious bigot.

Answer 4

Here are a few from the top of my head:
- Comparison of the genetic sequence of organisms reveals that closely related species have more genetic material in common than species that are less related. Example: human DNA compared to chimpanzee DNA and DNA of other mammals

- Adaptation of bacteria to antibiotics

- Adaptation of insects to changing food sources

My source also has a large paragraph with evidence.
Note that the fossil record is so incomplete that it is more an indication of evolution rather than proof.

Answer 5

There is endless proofs these days for the theory of evolution.
The main one is the use of Carbon Dating this can tell how may millions of years or thousands of years old any fossil or item is.
The Second is Archeology discovering fossils etc
The museums are filled with these proofs.
Medical science has discovered things about the body our DNA etc which adds to the theory of evolution.

Answer 6

I pose a question for yourself to look into because I'm sure that you will find this answer along the way. What scientific proof has there been to actualy dismiss the theory of God?

Answer 7

None.

He based his theory on a specific breed of birds, which can come with short fat beaks or long narrow beaks, ie., humans come with short fat noses and long narrow noses.

He observed that during lean years, when seeds were harder, the birds tended to grow short fat beaks which enabled them to break open the seeds better. During fat years, when seeds were plentiful and softer due to the humidity, the bird's beaks tended to be longer. Yet, during both lean and fat years, both style of beaks could be found. There were just more of one than the other.

Fact is, all it proved was that "only the strong survive." Obviously the long beaked birds of the species could not survive well during lean years. And during fat years, short fat beaked birds didn't reduce in numbers, there was just a smaller ratio of them during those years.

What evolutionists never point out is that Darwin died a devout Christian, and he himself said that he had no proof that his theory was correct.

Answer 8

The evolution of a horses foot is a big one. Also, the use for the appendix in humans is no longer needed, but needed in the past.

Answer 9

The research done on Peppered moths was predictive and clearly demonstrated.

Answer 10

what scientific proofs back up religion?