2006-06-21 00:31:24 · 5 answers · asked by cristof1357 2 in Consumer Electronics ➔ PDAs & Handhelds
Formats like 'wma' and 'ogg' are a bit more efficient than mp3, but not THAT much. Nowhere near. Besides, If you convert an mp3 to wma you'll loose quality in the transition. (Because mp3 and wma are both lossy formats.)
It could make sense to rip your next few CDs to wma, but don't bother converting your existing mp3 tunes.
2006-06-21 00:47:00 · answer #1 · answered by OMG, I ♥ PONIES!!1 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not really...This is not a matter of the format, it is more of the Bitrate you use. the norm is 128k, WMA is somewhat popular because it is the built in music ripper. Since most mp3 rippers cost you 20 to 80 oinline, people went with the freebee already installed. I would keep my mp3's and just get a bigger storage card...
~J
2006-06-21 07:47:50 · answer #2 · answered by bigdaddy_longstroke_2000 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, it will.... WMA can compress more than MP3...... About half the size of MP3, but the quality also declines significantly... If you want quality, go for MP3, and if u want quantity , go for WMA.
2006-06-21 00:35:39 · answer #3 · answered by nice_libra_guy 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
its as a lot as you yet i will assure you that the agency inventive makes very very very sturdy MP3 gamers, I ensue to have one and it particularly works beautifly I recommend you're taking the provide even as you could.. sturdy luck I you're taking my advice you'll like it!
2016-10-20 11:07:21 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It will help but you can try to convert it into real player formats than it can handle most ...
2006-06-21 00:36:00 · answer #5 · answered by Sara 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋