Can you argue for homosexuality?

Question

What arguments can you make in support of homosexuality that are purely based on our physical bodies?

No points awarded for religious or emotional "love" answers (Why? Read the question).
No points awarded for using the DNA farce or the "it just feels good" argument (Why? They're idiotic).

Homosexual animals??? Please don't argue this one. For if you've actually seen such a thing, you'd be an idiot not to have snatched them up and sold them to the ACLU. Secondly, I've actually witnessed mother animals eating their young. Does that mean its okay for humans?

Answer 1

Homosexuality occurs in nature. This is a fact. Homosexuality is accepted in cultures as early as the Roman times. This is a fact. The restrictions of your question imply that human nature is not part of our physical body, but physiologically, it is. A homosexual male will have great difficulty performing strictly reproductive sex with a female, and heterosexual sex with a homosexual female would NOT be pleasurable. In fact, it would be rape, which is illegal and immoral. The penis and the clitoris enable orgasm for a reason, and not solely for the purpose of reproduction. Otherwise, all hetersexuals would be fetile. And with the world's over population, fetility and reproduction are not the problems they used to be.

Answer 2

The physical body is not separate from the mind and could not exist without one. No argument is needed for a person's preference. Only people who are worried by the different behavior and belief's of others need justification or evidence for things that people have been doing forever. You seem to think this is a question without an answer. I would like to know what the physical body argument is for being heterosexual. We do not exist without the ideas and beliefs we have and so a purely physical argument is in fact not possible. No matter what we say or explain will have to do with how we perceive of something. And we already know that we do not agree universally as a world populous about many things.

Answer 3

It make sense that it exists. I've seen homosexual animals before and animals have no concept of right and wrong like we do, yet there are some that are homo and others that are not, just like people.

Also, I've seen people that are really homo, just a little homo, and not at all homo. It just makes more sense that everything exists. I think it is more strange to expect everyone to be the same.

I don't think I can make an argument that it is right because I don't feel that it is a right/wrong issue, but has only become such an issue because of people that hate and misunderstand.

I have to say though, it is not conducive to family life nor the reproduction of our species.

Answer 4

homosexual acts or a relationship? well anyway everyone at some point in life either thinks about and/or has a homosexual experience whether it be invited or accidental, Arguments are merely opinions of the parties defending their opinions. If a person is judged for personal preference rather then being accepted for everything that makes them who they are then in my opinion the 1 doing the judging may be avoiding conflicts of their own.

Answer 5

they are exhibiting that they are "reasonable", "actual looking", even "scientific" Christians. they are not like those different men. regrettably, they have an truly constrained awareness of genetics and the evolutionary technique in keeping with at maximum suitable each and every week or 2 of learn in intense college. some have suggestions as stepped forward as recessive genes yet this is pushing it. Many characteristics that seem to run counter to the survival of the species are particularly uncomplicated. I even have very gentle epidermis this is truly broken by making use of sunlight. It supplies me no evolutionary benefit yet there are hundreds persons interior the worldwide. a lot of my acquaintances are lactose illiberal. does not God breed out a trait that basically approximately gets rid of an entire food team from the eating recurring of an significant component of the worldwide's inhabitants? the worldwide isn't so user-friendly as user-friendly people know it to be.

Answer 6

Because in the case in which homosexuality is argued, it is two consenting adults having sex.

Seriously, the only people who argue against this are people who think rape is the fault of the victim, women are all whores and how big of a whore they are depends on how many times they've had sex, who think that the highest point of humanity is popping out a child.

Answer 7

Because God designed the penis to fit into the rectum. It's pure coincidence that it also fits into a vagina.

Because two men or two women can much more easily reproduce and repopulate the Earth in the event of a major catastrophe than a man and a woman can.

Answer 8

Only to say that what you do in the privacy of your space should not be construed as being acceptable to everyone. It's your business, don't make it mine by assuming that it is proper.

Answer 9

The location of the male G spot?