People just keep spitting out kids like no tommorrow. Shouldnt we have a limit on how many kids we have.
2006-06-20 23:14:18 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Other - Cultures & Groups
Hello..I do care..It is a serious problem,but as you know in many developing countries people never heard of things like Birth control,condoms..etc. The prospect is not rose-coloured at all,because most of that population was born in extreme poverty,will be raisen in that poverty and will have offsprings..A VERY BLEAK PERSPECTIVE!!!
2006-06-20 23:18:09 · answer #1 · answered by sunflower 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I care.
The legal solution is obvious:
Institute a strict limit of 1, 2, or 3 children per couple (the specific number is determined by how bad the problem is at the time). Aborted fetuses, or babies / children that die at a young age are subtracted from the maximum. Any parent that kills their offspring because they don't like their gender (as has occurred in China) is punished by execution.
As for implementing that policy, that requires voting for the politicians that favor and promote that policy. Currently there are very few or none. However, the filthy politicians can be circumvented via a ballot initiative in certain states of the U.S., but it still may not pass.
The largest problem is that not enough people want to prevent overpopulation in the first place. Opposition to population control results from crude blind wrongful intent, and it is the people of said intent that spit out the most babies. In turn, the genes that create their crude blind wrongful intent are passed on to their offspring, such that the offspring also oppose population control. Such people of crude blind wrongful intent are largely religious fanatics and other fanatics. Support of population control results from a relatively fine clear rightful intent, which is likewise genetic. People that oppose population control often decide to not have children, but that is the very worst thing that they can do, because by doing so, they are removing from the gene pool the very genes that can stop overpopulation. Therefore, it is precisely the people that want to prevent overpopulation that should reproduce the most.
2006-06-21 07:20:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ever since the 1960's, I 've been hearing out the earth is over-populating. And the always referred to ... "and by the year 2000, -we'll have xxx amount of people....". Well it appears the year 2000 came and went and the earth didn't stop turning, the way some would suggest.
Overpopulation is very subjective. But anybody can complain about a problem, -what would you do for a solution? Many consider producing and providing for their kids a basic 'right' of society. Should we force sterilize people so that person can never have any more kids? Should we sterilize "undesirables"? She we abort (kill) babies, the pre-born, -so that that the post-borns have more food / resources? Who's to say that there's too many Chinese, but not enough Scandinavians? Who decides what the quota's should be.
As you can see, overpopulation might be a problem, but certainly the 'cure' for this is MORE difficult.
2006-06-21 06:18:01 · answer #3 · answered by MK6 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I care! I've cared since 1970 when the population was 3.5 billion. That's why I never had kids and wanted to adopt.
In many ways, our nation and our culture encourages people to multiply. I'm not an advocate of abortion or any kind of forced limits. But it makes sense that people should recognize this planet has limited resources and take sensible precautions.
Unfortunately, there are not enough people like you and I out there- oh my that sounds like we should create a few more, huh. Just kidding. But we do need to educate the ones out there!
2006-06-21 06:23:32 · answer #4 · answered by niteowl 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No we shouldn't have a limit; there is far too much governmental control over our lives as it is. But I am very concerned about the teen pregnancy rate. I cannot believe that girls in high school are so eager to get pregnant and think that life will be easy for them. Perhaps they need an education class that takes them into the homes of single teen parents to see just how difficult life is for them.
2006-06-21 07:16:52 · answer #5 · answered by blue_lotus 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I know! Its one of my pet peeves. They try to ban abortion without realising that that is the most humane way for a unwanted child to go. They keep trying to keep the children in third world countries alive where there is the worst overpopulation.
People think I am callous but it really is an issue that has to be addressed soon before we kill everything else.
2006-06-21 06:18:23 · answer #6 · answered by bushbaby_rsa 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes i care, but young boys will have unprotected sex with girls that dont take the responsibility of taking the pill. and while there is a big hand out for having kids all the time the problem will always exist.
2006-06-21 06:22:27 · answer #7 · answered by fireball71_33 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I care and have talked to my kids about it already. No one ever talked to me about kids or birth control. All we can do is talk to our kids and hope they have more control over making kids than we have thus far.
2006-06-27 15:27:15 · answer #8 · answered by Carole 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They tried that in China, the result was that parents would kill their kids when they didn't like their gender.
2006-06-21 06:19:51 · answer #9 · answered by zmm 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i do... but i have too much faith in chaos generally to believe we're all doomed... but yeah... in a world of 6 billion people and growing... heterosexuality is the most immoral and debase sexual fetish and pregnancy the worst venereal disease.
2006-06-21 06:19:35 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋