Would u rather be blind or have no legs??

Answer 1

no legs....cuz "Mexican American's got no legs"

Answer 2

Easy choice here, of course having no legs --- at least you could be fitted with a workable false pair...and Science surrounding Robotics is ever getting better --- don't forget that Paul McCarthy (of Beatles Fame) is married to a woman with only one natural leg but she wears a very nice looking fake one to make up for the missing leg, i saw her on TV and when the camera zoomed in on her legs i couldn't tell which was which....Science has yet to make a blind person see, hopefully that's coming in the future.

Answer 3

No legs. If I am blind then the use of my legs becomes considerably less meaningful I think.

I would probably stumble over some sh*t and break my legs before it was all done anyway.

Answer 4

no legs. Im an artist, I cant imagine not seeing. altho ive thought about it i can still live when the time comes that i go blind, i can still go into music, probably start learning the piano.

Answer 5

If i had to, no legs. but i would rather have neither

Answer 6

blind

cause they can still do alot cause u just firgure alot out u always seem them getting around pretty well

plus you could get to love someone by there personality

and you would have easier better sex

Answer 7

no legs because they made artificial legs but not yet artificial eyes

Answer 8

have no legs, eyesight is in my opinion the second best sense, (1st is touch)

Answer 9

no legs

Answer 10

no legs