What do you think of this HIV = AIDS debate as per the article linked below?

Question

http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig7/brown-d2.html

Answer 1

You know these is ridiculous on both parties. We should be focusing on a cure for AIDS and push the issue of prevention. Both parties are backing their theory but yet no one wants to SCIENTIFICALLY prove it by conducting real reasearch. I mean since they are both proclaiming to be of the scientific profession then why would you just proclaim that you're right and he is wrong without having any information to back your theory?

Answer 2

I agree with Professor Moore's assertian that:

"Any scientist who claims that HIV does not
cause AIDS (or that HIV does not exist) is
simply not credible, essentially as a point of
definition. The evidence is so overwhelming
that a credible scientist could not fail to
understand and accept it… Would astrophysicists
and geologists debate with people who believed
the moon was made of green cheese?"

While there is not a proven causal link between the two, there is overwhelming evidence that HIV is interrelated with cases of AIDS and predates them. The concept of a "legitimate" debate is useless as the "experts" who would debate that HIV is not related to AIDS are not credible.

Answer 3

Absurd. This whole crowd's assertion that HIV/AIDs comes as a result of drug use is stupid.

Answer 4

Don't know what to think.