I think we need to advertise her public record. What has she really done to better her fellow man/woman in the service of the government and the people? All I see are sound bites and political bashing coupled with the blame-game without offering solutions. This is enough for me NOT to really consider her for anything. As long as she has been a Senator from New York, what is on her list of accomplishments for New York.
Of course she has time to mature before the election, but if it were held today--no way, that is an easy decision, she is not even close to main-stream America.
2006-06-20 17:47:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by atmjay 3
·
8⤊
1⤋
Well the liberals don't like her anymore because of her support of the war. The conservatives don't like her because...well...she's Hillary. Which leaves a few people who don't know anything about politics and think it's time for a woman president. I agree it's time, but she's not a woman--she's a monster. Anyway, she's been the least effective Senator anywhere in the U.S. It's all PR for her. If you want proof of that, visit her website and look at her "Issues" section. It's like--"Attempted to this, and Attempted to that."
I don't think either Jesse Ventura or Schwartzeneiger would make good presidents, but they would both be better than Hillary!
I think the best person to run would be John Linder from Georgia. Check out HIS issues page. Plus, he's already fighting for the people.
2006-06-20 17:45:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by Rockstar 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
You don't have to worry. The Democrats do not have the guts to have Hillary Clinton run for President. They have worked too hard to convince the American public that President Bush and the Republicans are bad people. If they had Hillary run, they would never win the election and they know it! If she ran, all of the lies, Democratic propaganda and the bashing of conservatives by the liberal news media would be wasted.
2006-06-20 17:53:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by Paula P 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
oh no not the governator, Hillary yes, she would probably put an end to all the deadbeat dads and have them circumcised just for the hell of it. If she is smart she will stay with the guy for political reasons, men do it all the time and get away with it, well some get away with it without getting caught.
Jesse Ventura-would be my first choice. though
2006-06-20 18:05:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by mari r 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'll take Hillary over another conservative. Jesse Ventura - no way!!! I live in Minnesota he was a waste of 4 years. Arnold can't be president, he wasn't born in the US. How about Barrack Obamma???
2006-06-20 17:53:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by Tommy D 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
i desire Hillary Clinton does replace into President.. one extra helpful ingredient..bill Clinton, replace into is an wonderful spokesman..And did nicely with distant places international locations. good now we choose international kinfolk .. or a minimum of a few advice from a former president, who knew the thank you to talk and comprehend leaders from distant places international locations! i'm particular he could be a great asset to Hillary!
2016-10-31 05:30:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would rather Barack Obama, then Hillary Clinton. Clinton is not enough like her husband. in fact I think her support of the war in Iraq really upsets. She is just way to republican for me. (even though she is a democrat)
2006-06-20 17:44:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by simpatico_17_98 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oh Hell No -
She and her husband Billy bob clinton need to go in a car ride with Ted kennedy across a bridge...
2006-06-20 18:06:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by fscape444 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
She certainly doesnt' scare me as much as the current president. Anyone would be better than W and his administration of liars and crooks.
2006-06-20 17:42:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by Tommy L 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
If she can help the economy and make it even a little better than what George has messed up in it, I'm for her.
2006-06-20 17:43:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by djpetramw 3
·
0⤊
0⤋