a nuclear one say... and everyone but 2 people would die... and you could choose the 2 people who would they be... would you want to survive?
2006-06-20 16:50:40 · 107 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
My son and his wife would be the new Adam and Eve.
2006-06-20 16:54:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The nuclear explosion would have to be big to wipe out all but 2 people, and those 2 people would probably die from the fallout anyhow.
An EMP strike would do much more damage, as it'd cane in anything with a microchip in it.
2006-06-20 19:52:06 · answer #2 · answered by Scott Bull 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A man and a woman that are trained in survival and have a broad knowledge of basically everything. I don't think any celebrities fit this bill, they'd have to be some kind of outdoor genius types.
That way they could perpetuate the human race, and actually restore some of the knowledge acquired by mankind since his beginnings, instead of starting all over in the stone age.
2006-06-28 21:55:12 · answer #3 · answered by nukecat25 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I know I am going to Heaven when i die so no i don't want to survive. The 2 people i would pick would be my son because he is too young to die and his girlfriend so they can live happily ever after and repopulate the worl with gorgeous well behaved people.
2006-06-30 13:13:31 · answer #4 · answered by tenshi_muth 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course I would want to survive, but if it was up to me and I could only choose two people I would have to choose my niece and nephew. They're three and five years old and I love them more than any one else in the world.
2006-07-02 18:10:51 · answer #5 · answered by Cadetphoenix 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think in a situation like that it would be better if everyone died.
Any survivors would have no food or water. Everything would be contaminated. No animals to kill & eat & even if there were surely they would also be contaminated. No crops - all destroyed in the explosion. All they would have to look forward to would be a slow painful death. Better to die quickly along with everyone else.
Cheery, arent I?
2006-06-23 07:47:16 · answer #6 · answered by monkeyface 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is a really difficult one to answer. Sometimes at night I worry what would happen if there was a fire and I only had time to save one of my children. I have never come up with an answer as I just would not like to be in that situation. I'm sure others have thought of similar situations
2006-06-25 23:36:14 · answer #7 · answered by Foxy Chick 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
someone i didn't like. It would be pretty nasty out there in the nuclear winter, waiting to die of radiation, if you don't die of hunger first. Obviously Bush tops the list, him and some blood hungry mercenary with a high powered rifle
2006-06-21 01:59:33 · answer #8 · answered by zara c 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bill and Melinda Gates. Male and female. High intelligence. Would be able to start the world over again without regressing backwards. Both visionaries. Good people. Philathropists. Willing to share their wealth.
2006-06-28 12:21:48 · answer #9 · answered by diniandbo812 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hard as this is to say but I would hope that me and my whole family died to spare the pain of it all and the awful life afterwards, and the 2 people i would like to leave is my husbands ex wife and a serial rapist---sorry no that was first thought, um her and someone with no legs no arms and cant speak, thats even better ;)
2006-06-20 16:54:13 · answer #10 · answered by ♥My 2 Cents♥ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow that is tough. I would like to think that I would want my kids to survive but then there is my parents and my boyfriend. So I guess if I had to choose I would want to die too.
2006-06-28 06:28:01 · answer #11 · answered by jd77 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋