Is this wreck still my fault?

Question

O.K... I got in a wreck that was said to be my fault. It is said that I ran a red light and this is how it was determined that the wreck was my fault (even though I was side swiped). Well, I was issued a ticket for running the red light which I went to court for. I got the ticket dismissed due to a technicality. Is the wreck still considered my fault since I got the ticket dismissed?

Answer 1

Just because the ticket was dismissed does not mean you are not at fault in the accident. In your case since you say you got it dismissed for a technicality instead of "I proved I didn't run a red light" it will still stand as the cause of the accident. Remember from your own wording you did not disprove that you ran the light, rather you got a ticket dismissed, these are two seperate things. One can be at fault in an accident and not be issued a ticket. The decison to issue a ticket is up to the police, but even if they don't it's not considered proof that you're not at fault, only that you were lucky and got away without a ticket.

Answer 2

you only got the ticket dismissed on a technicality so that could mean anything. So yes that accident is still your fault unless they can prove that you did not run a red light.

Answer 3

In most states, the opinion of the police regarding causation is NOT ADMISSIBLE as evidence. Also, many states adopt the doctrine of comparative negligence and this means a judge or jury could find you less than 100% at fault. By asking if the wreck was your fault, you are really asking us to predict what a jury and/or a judge might decide. You haven't posted enough of the facts to answer that question.

Answer 4

let me first state that i'm satisfied you've been no longer damage and in reality have a pair hundred money damage on your motorbike-purchase some reliable used forks and spend an afternoon swapping them out and also you'd be again on the line. stay and study. Now as for the twist of destiny, as each body else has stated, YOU rear ended yet another automobile. You were for sure no longer on correct of problems with your automobile and going to quickly for the circumstances you got here across your self in. It does no longer keep in mind that the SUV's brake light fixtures were no longer operating. YOU as an alert, attentive driving force must have talked about that you've been catching as a lot because the automobile and reacted in the previous you probably did. it quite is why they teach countless technics on the MSF classes. you understand Braking, brake and swerve, serve and brake etc. i do no longer understand which one would are transforming into you out of this project unscaved if any, even though it may well be worth investigating and once you've already taken the direction, then prepare what you realized until eventually eventually it really is going to develop into 2d nature. satisfied you're nevertheless with us, and attempt to do better appropriate. that's way lower priced on many degrees in the destiny.

Answer 5

Hopefully you have insurance. If you do have insurance, it is up to the insurance company's to haggle over the blame game. The fact that the ticket was dismissed on a technicality will probably not have any affect on who pays for what.

Answer 6

yes, It's a double whammy. I got a ticket for an accident. A speeding ticket, I wasn't speeding but the "safe speed" would have been nothing so the fact that I was moving=speeding. I got traffic school for the speeding ticket but still got the points and increased insurance.

Answer 7

It depends who said it was your fault. The police? Then, yes, unless you can prove they were wrong in court. Good luck with that!

Answer 8

Yes, your insurance company is "the decider" on this one (sorry W). They'll be the place to get a straight answer on this one.

Answer 9

No but i wish you the best of luck. The legal system is ******* and corupted