2006-06-20 15:43:15 · 10 answers · asked by max c 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The majority because we had the right to. Idiot move to France.
2006-06-20 15:46:04 · answer #1 · answered by me29876_ 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I did!!!! He was and is the best man for the job, I have no regrets. He gets the job done. I can't begin to imagine how Al Gore or John Kerry would have handled the past six years. Funny thing is that everyone makes fun of President Bush and the way he speaks, but have you listened to Gore or Kerry? President Bush can mispronounce words, Gore and Kerry are both very articulate, but SAY NOTHING . Al Gore rants, screams and acts like a drama queen, John Kerry is boring and personally I find him quite condescending. Thank You.
2006-06-20 23:00:35 · answer #2 · answered by rosi l 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
62,040,606 voted for President Bush.
That Kerry guy got 59,028,109
Nader got 411,304
The reason I voted for him is that I felt he understood the threat of international terrorism. I didn't feel that Kerry seriously understood this threat. In debates, President Bush clearly expressed his plans for moving forward. He had direction. I felt that Kerry's whole campaign was based on "Vote for me because I'm not Bush.' There was little substance to his campagin. I felt his answers to questions in debates were weaker.
In all reality, this presidentail election, like many of the past 15 or 20 years, has been about choosing the lesser of two (or three) evils. I haven't seen any candidate that has gotten me excited enough to go out and campaign for them. It's all a matter of choosing the lesser of the evils.
2006-06-20 22:52:59 · answer #3 · answered by BAM 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
More than voted for Gore and Kerry, thank heaven. Why? Because he was the better candidate. Can you imagine either of the other two as President? We'd still be trying to "talk" our way with Afghanistan, Iraq, Al Quida, et al. We'd be asking things like, what can we do to keep you from blowing up any other buildings in America?
2006-06-27 12:06:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I voted for him because Kerry is the scariest man alive. If the Dems could come up with a good candidate, I might vote for them.
2006-06-20 22:47:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush 62,040,606
Kerry 59,028,109
Nader 411,304
That's how many. Now, why? I would venture to say they believed his BS more than Kerry's BS.
2006-06-20 22:50:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lots of them, including me. Because he was the better man for the job.
2006-06-20 22:47:16 · answer #7 · answered by Huevos Rancheros 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I voted for him. He was the best candidate available to us...which isn't saying very much, unfortunately.
2006-06-20 22:46:49 · answer #8 · answered by Jen 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
More then for Gore or Kerry and because they think he would be better - not perfect but better.
2006-06-20 22:47:23 · answer #9 · answered by sfavorite711 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Obviously, the majority did....I did, and did so because he was the best man for the job...still think so.
2006-06-20 23:00:10 · answer #10 · answered by loubean 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋