why or why not?
2006-06-20 15:12:36 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Absolutely. There would be no difference between a male president and a female president. I would not, however, vote for Hillary Clinton. She is an extreme socialist that would be devastating for our country.
2006-06-20 15:16:22 · answer #1 · answered by mrknositall 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Condaleeza Rice has been an exemplary Secretary of State. She would do a lot to boost the image of our country. Taking potshots at Bush is easy, but in the age of PC, try doing that to a black female.
Condaleeza Rice, whether she was white, brown, or green would make a great president. She is highly intelligent, focused, a great public speaker with lots of charisma and poise, and a tough negotiator.
Sounds like Presidential material to me.
2006-06-20 15:26:45 · answer #2 · answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Certainly I'd vote for a woman for president. But not Hillary Clinton because she supported the illegal war, and definitely not Condi Rice because she's a war criminal.
2006-06-20 15:17:43 · answer #3 · answered by Pandak 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Condi 08
2006-06-21 09:14:45 · answer #4 · answered by donaldmc79 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would; but, the U.S. has a long way to go before it truly happens. As you might remember, public discrimination ended only about half a century ago.
I don't think we're ready for a big leap like a woman president.
2006-06-20 15:21:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would, I would try to list a reason why, but I don't think there's one, really. The reason I would vote for a woman president is because there's no reason not to.
2006-06-20 18:46:20 · answer #6 · answered by cay_damay 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, because it's time to give women a chance after seeing what some male presidents have done to this country (ex. current president).
2006-06-20 15:30:56 · answer #7 · answered by arabian_hottie_16 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely! Women can do everything men can do, and a lot of times, they can do it better!
And down with people who are calling Condi, Hillary, Janet Reno, etc. lesbians b/c they're jealous of the power those women have!
2006-06-20 15:36:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. But in order to convince conservative chauvinists, she'll have to be a Maggie Thatcher iron-lady type; cojones of steel.
2006-06-20 15:32:50 · answer #9 · answered by inpoetry1 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, if her name was Condolezza Rice because I think that she would make a great leader and I agree with most of what she does
2006-06-20 15:15:30 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋