2006-06-20 13:23:04 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football (American)
Fact
They went four straight times to the NFC Championship game. Donovan is a consistent, 5-time Pro Bowl quarterback with a good arm and strong scrambling ability. He is far from being the best, but he is someone who has more concern for his team's chances than his own records.
When TO went down before the playoffs, Donovan still orchestrated a playoff run that culminated to their first NFC championship win and a trip to the Super Bowl.
McNabb will have Pinkston back for the season plus Westbrook operating at full speed, Reggiw Brown and Ryan Moats ready to explode offensively, and L.J. Smith itching to bring in TDs. Terrell Owens was beneficial in spreading out defenses, but his presence was not crucial.
Donovan does not need Terrell. Nuff said.
2006-06-20 14:35:38 · answer #1 · answered by icehoundxx 6 · 6⤊ 3⤋
Can't say McNabb will be better without him the numbers are the numbers and he really improved with him there.
BUT, to say McNabb is overrated is lame. Name the other QB's that took their team to 4 straight NFC championship games (McNabb did it 3 times without T.O.) the list is short.
2006-06-20 21:40:40 · answer #2 · answered by pico_pica81 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Fact - McNabb is way better off without T.O
2006-06-20 20:35:40 · answer #3 · answered by Kyle 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
McNabb is worthless w/o T.O. Drew Bledsoe's career will be reinvented this year when the best wide reciever this decade is on the same side of the ball as him. McNabb is not even as good as Bledsoe. So McNabb won't be better and he won't be worse he will still just be average, and the eagles are going to crash land this year.
2006-06-20 20:33:32 · answer #4 · answered by eagle_eyes 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
T.O. made McNabb look better. Without TO he's just an average NFL quarterback.
2006-06-21 00:55:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Perhaps. McNabb, at times, can be overrated. But, don't get me wrong...he's still a good QB. But I think he'll be much better this year with out all of the bull s*** that T.O. caused him and the organization. GO STEELERS!
2006-06-20 20:30:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Fiction, where was he BEFORE T.O. Don't say about how they got to the Superbowl with T.O. injured because I can't give you some details to counter that. Like 1. T.O. helped them get to where they could rest the players so they would be fresh for the playoffs. 2. T.O. provided a distraction for the media keeping pressure OFF the team.
2006-06-20 21:00:23 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
fact, T.O might have been good for one year but McNabb was good before he came, and there wining the NFC East, and crushing Dallas!!
GO EAGLES!
2006-06-20 20:49:33 · answer #8 · answered by John N 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Team-wise BETTER.....When T.O. went to Dallas GOOD thing Keshawn..Left...or there would have been trouble in TEXAS....
as for McNabb...whose he got to go to....why didn't they go after MOULDS...or even for next to nothing GARDNER (car)
Looks like the same thing this year AGAIN
2006-06-20 21:22:37 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
fact, mcnabb can now concentrate with having to worry about what t o is doing
2006-06-20 23:03:08 · answer #10 · answered by me in town 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋