I paid through the nose for a house with a good elementary school, volunteer, pay money to the annual fund, buy magazines, attend LEARN meetings, act as an advocate for my kids, and in this school it works.
Looking ahead beyond elementary school, given the emphasis put on ESL programs for an ever cycling group of new legal and illegal immigrants (although the legal ones tend to stay and get better at English) the choices are limited. I will always be active, but if the classes are overcrowded, the basic education my children get will be reduced. I work, so I need to rely on the school to primarily educate my children. That is what we pay for.
It is a fact that the required progress in 'all demographic groups' means that if one demographic group is one that cycles through such as the ESL population in California schools, it is very hard for it to 'get better' as a group. Since schools lose their funding if all groups don't 'get better' funding is disproportionately spent on ESL students. Other special learning needs like dyslexia and education for the deaf or, heaven forbid, for the highly gifted (who unlike the gifted 'turn off' in school and actually have education problems) are not funded because there is no tracked 'demographic' for those problems. Yet we are the ones paying the true cost of education and subsidizing others for it. For legal immigrants that is one thing, but for illegal immigrants, this really burns me up.
I know you and I don't see eye to eye on this point. However, you phrase your question as if 'blaming ESL classes' was a cop out. It is an analysis of where scarce funds are going. At the same time in Southern California it includes a huge number of children of illegal immigrants, who are not budgeted in our system and by drawing funds and slowing instruction are degrading education for those who have a right to be here.
My kids right now are doing well. However, I had already agonized and decided I would either have to find a way to send them to highschool in a private school, or move out of the state. I think it is unfair that they can't get a good and safe education here, but it is a fact.
Now coming on middle school I am hearing about kids being beaten with chains by mini-gang bangers even in the public middle school with the best magnet program everyone tries to get into. The person weilding the chain (I'm thinking of a specific instance) was not in the magnet program, but was in the PE class with those who were. Now I have no idea what to do about middle school. If I send the kids to middle school in private school, it will come out of any hope of retirement security. I don't think that is fair either.
2006-06-21 05:13:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by DAR 7
·
9⤊
3⤋
yes, I did. In grade school my kids attended private school.After that I moved to a location, where the school system was better. I think the reason for failing grades or poor scores, some kids don't understand and are afraid to ask for help or some kids don't apply themselves. You also have some teachers that are only teaching for a pay check and don't care if the kids learn. One thing I did learn, the difference between private school and public school. The private school teachers are paid by the parents and if a kid doesn't learn it's the teachers fault. In public school the teachers are paid by the state and if a kid doesn't learn, so be it, they will be paid regardless.
2006-06-20 12:59:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by kitty45 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I even have been stationed at citadel Carson and citadel Stewart. they have been doing alot of artwork on the two submit on housing. they have as much as date some are no diverse then any apartment you will locate off submit. execs. faculties are greater useful on submit for the main area via being overseen by utilising the goverment particularly then community community. site visitors is yet another massive plus on submit. It used to take me 20 - 30 min to get to artwork at citadel Stewart and that i lived much less then a mile from the back gate. yet another plus isn't any lease. of path you do lose your BAH in spite of the indisputable fact that it balances out. Cons significant con is that there are particular policies you're able to desire to maintain on with. yet once you're looking after your area then there's no longer something to rigidity approximately. My suggestion till you will purchase a house you're greater useful on submit then off. by utilising the way the two submit have a rather long waiting record for housing you're able to touch them and locate out how long. by utilising the way I lived on submit at citadel Stewart for 3 years and no person ever got here to ascertain my living house.
2016-12-08 23:22:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
My parents didn't. They lived where they did because the house was cheap. But, thanks to being in such a poor neighborhood, I qualified for a scholarship based on the area my high school was in.
2006-06-20 12:45:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous 6
·
0⤊
0⤋