Ok, so most of us agree that the pentagon's statement is bullsh**. I just wanted to make a comment to those who are pissed at the guy who posted this ques. Did you read the whole thing before you answered? He doesn't agree either, dumbasses. He even stated that those people are a disgrace to the civilized world. Stop being so f***ing immature!
2006-06-20 14:50:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by Erin 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
properly, your first situation is which you haven't any information between the version between faith and Salvation. even with the indisputable fact that Atheist's will deny it, they are very non secular. faith is purely a perception device it particularly is worshipped. Worship is purely the act of giving your interest to a minimum of a few thing. So the Communist worships his government, and the Atheist worship himself. he will call it technological understanding, and intellectualism, yet we could purely be actual, he likes questioning he's greater useful than those undesirable non secular human beings, and the non secular human beings think of an identical of him. Philosophy is the affection of mans awareness, and that's what the Atheist loves, mans awareness. So surely the Communist, the Marxist, the Atheist, at the instant are not basically any diverse than the non secular Theocrat. The atheists kill non secular human beings to close them up, they are bigots, and something that would not slot of their perception device is rejected as stupid. No diverse than the communist or the Marxist, or any non secular guy or woman. the only distinction is that the non secular guy or woman believes there's a God, even with the indisputable fact that they frequently fail to stipulate that, and the Atheists, el al, say there's no longer. The Atheist is his very own god, and he worships himself. The atheist believes what he examine in a e book, as does the non secular guy or woman. The Atheist accepts Evolution by utilising faith with none scientific information (they settle for what scientists say, yet no longer what scientists can teach). The non secular guy accepts creation by utilising faith. in reality, they are 2 aspects of an identical coin. perhaps it particularly is why they dislike one yet another plenty. So are non secular human beings mentally unwell? whilst, Atheists via history have committed all the failings you have listed above, in equivalent degree. So if one is psychological, so is the different. the different of the two is the guy who has no longer a faith of mans innovations, yet has a real relationship with the writer of Heaven and Earth. one which has had a private and biblical account of Salvation, and would not in basic terms have faith, yet knows previous any shadow of a doubt that there is a Heaven, and there's a Hell, and that their sins are all long previous, and Heaven is their living house. This guy or woman desires no Theocracy, and argues against the twin sisters of lost Theist and the lost Atheist.
2016-12-08 23:21:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Given that medically homosexuality hasn't been counted as a disorder since 1972 -- and hundreds of studies have shown it is not a disorder -- I pity the Pentagon, but they have to justify the policy that we have of not allowing out-gays to serve their country. That becomes increasingly difficult as very close to all of our allies have allowed military service by homosexuals for decades now.
Unfortunately for the Pentagon, declaring something to be factual when you are not in agreement with any of the science does not make it factual -- it just makes you look stupid.
Regards,
Reynolds Jones
Schenectady, NY
http://www.rebuff.org
2006-06-20 14:39:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
A comment for huh?....you don't want homosexuals to promote it? Are you afraid that you will become converted?
Homosexuality isn't a mental illness or a communicable disease, it isn't something you can turn on or off, it is a sexual orientation that you have built into your genetic makeup. Everyone has different preferences, don't criticize someone for liking brunettes over blonds, what does it matter to you anyways?!?
Of course if it is a mental disorder, then when are they going to send me my monthly disability check, and handicapped parking sticker!!!
2006-06-20 13:10:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by FORNIDO 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I had read that as well. I think it's absolutely embarrassing what the US is doing to homosexuals. Mentally ill? The idea that it's a mental issue may not bother me as much as the ill part.
2006-06-20 12:11:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by holidayspice 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
It was already disproved years ago. Next they'll be telling everyone that when we see the flash we should all duck under our desks for protection. Homosexuality is a genetic trait that has recently been discovered and is still being studied. No medication has ever affected how gay I am.
2006-06-20 12:08:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by BA6793 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
i'm not homosexual but i do believe that it is an extreme form of hermaphidite. it's like all there body prts are in the right place except what they like sexually. Especially when they say ex. i feel like a boy in a girls body or vice versa. plus i think its none of anybodys business what anybody like sexually. if this was truly a free country this would not be an issue.
2006-06-20 12:10:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by reaganmichele1985 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
As a heterosexual (but strong GLBT supporter) and a former Republican, I'd say that's an idiotic theory. The government should butt out of people's love lives.
2006-06-20 12:08:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by chaotic_mum 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
wow it is funny that you blame this on the republicans when the Democrats came up with the don't ask don't tell policy and would have had to know what the pentagons policy on this was.
2006-06-20 13:13:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by ♂ Randy W. ♂ 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
No homos are not mentally ill. they just prefer different things and should be accepted just like heterosexuals. Christians conservatives just like to stick their noses in other people's lives.
2006-06-20 12:11:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by Baconbits 3
·
0⤊
0⤋