To Gays....?

Question

You are nasty!!! Why would you want to have sex with someone that has the same exact parts as you? Men are not made to be with men and women are not made to be with women. Men and women have parts that fit together, like a puzzle. Don't you see? Or do you just like to be nasty?

Answer 1

Sorry you disgusting *****... Don't blame gays for that disgusting mess between you legs... When you look down do you blame us? According to your puzzle... men don't have places where men and place things and get pleasure too. In fact it's more of a perfect fit thatn that coouch that you have. So just because you have something that looks like roast beef between your legs doesn't mean I'm gonna eat... Why do i care what you think you friggen wh0re! Go back that high and mighty section (religion) and live you're hate filled life...

Answer 2

I bet You are one of those people who want to try it but are scared. If you think its so NASTY why not go to a different category, and you don't have to deal with the nasty people. Maybe your attitude is just nasty, maybe you are a bitter person, you have the choice to make a change, and being nasty and mean will age you fast, just look in the mirror. Good Luck!

Answer 3

To straights,
Just because it "fits" together, that does not mean you have to put it together! Besides it's not all about the sex! And who says that all gays are having weird nasty sex! YOU honey, are nasty, your the one coming up with these crazy ideas that we are having some weird nasty sex! Don't you see? It's not just about sex, it's about love, something that you obviously dont understand!

Answer 4

Honey, I can tell you're the God-fearing, tolerant person you were meant to be. I just wish other people shared our views. The world would be such a better place if we all could show our hateful, ugly sides as easily as you do.

Besides, you've probably had dick. You know how hot, irresistable, and addicting it is. How could anyone resist -straight or gay??!

...And YES, I really DO enjoy being nasty. Just look at the screen name.

Go fu(% yerself.

Answer 5

There is no made to fit. There is simply what is. You are entitled to believe whatever you want to believe. Belief rarely makes things real however.

Homosexuality is no more a choice than heterosexuality. People can tell you it is, you can believe them -- this is America, there is NO requirement that you not believe whatever you want. That won't change the belief from being false however.

The people with choice are the bisexuals. They can select either. My lover of nearly 15 years is bisexual. He selected to be with me. I understand this. The choice for gays however is to believe in themselves and live good, full lives -- or hide, be miserable and be someone/something other than what they are.

How do we know this? Well, let's start with animal studies. For hundreds of years it was commonly presumed that there were no exclusively homosexual animals -- I still hear that argument quoted occasionally. Yet, we know it is false. Not only do we know anectodally (I for example grew up on a farm. At one point we had a gay bull -- absolutely no response to the pheremones of females in heat at all -- much more interested in other bulls), but we also know scientifically. Hundreds of species have been studied, those species that had pair bonding also had homosexual pair bonding. The seminal study on this subject is Dr. Bruce Bagemihl -- "Biological Exuberance" from St. Martin's Press. You can probably get a used copy inexpensively from Amazon if you are interested, or from Barnes and Noble online.

So, what was classically the most powerful argument against the natural origins of homosexuality -- emasculated. And you can tell that many anti-gay leaders know it, because the argument is now much deemphasized compared to its usage 25 years ago.

Once you go beyond the natural law argument therefore -- you face the discussion of humanity itself.

Is homosexuality a choice? Well, is heterosexuality? For bisexuals who elect to be straight or gay -- it is a choice, clearly; but the average straight boi never has the ability to choose to be gay -- and those who are honest would tell you the same. Likewise, the average homosexual simply doesn't have a choice to be straight.

Again, anecdotally, its easy enough. I am gay, I knew that I felt very special about boys and that they excited me somehow, gave me butterflies in my stomach when I liked them a lot -- when I was 8. I also knew I didn't feel the same way about girls. By 11 I realized it was sexual (the reasons I realized that should be evident without my spelling them out). I never, ever had even a single erotic or sexual thought about a girl -- nor did I have any romantic feelings toward them. I always had some friends of each gender, as most young country people do -- but I never had any butterflies for the girls -- so when did I choose? At 7? Without knowing it? Do you really, really believe that? I don't think you do. You can assert that I'm lying to you, that all the millions of gays who say they never remember being anything but gay are lying -- but again, it doesn't pass the smell test -- do you really believe it? I doubt it very much. You are too honest for that, aren't you? So that leaves you with -- we have all deceived ourselves. I doubt that you believe that either, not deep inside.

Beyond that, study after study, piling up on one another. The eyeblink study strongly indicates a genetic origin. The pheremonal studies (there are multiple ones), even a logitudnal study that looked at prebirth reactions. And, most compelling, the fruitfly study. A colleague's husband, who is a medical researcher at Albany Med, sent me word the day after that came out -- saying simply "you've won, the troops in the trenches on both sides may take a while to realize it, but you've won, its natural." The counter attacks on the fruit fly study are, frankly, a joke -- and they depend on their readers not understanding the study to start with. Fruit-flies are simple compared to humans, and the genetic structures are much simpler -- but the simple fact is that changing a single gene from generation to generation changed whole generations of fruit-flies from heterosexual to homosexual and then back the next generation. Among humans its much more complex -- probably involving 4 to 6 chromosomal bands, possibly more -- perhaps as many as a quarter of all genes in various combinations -- but ultimately it will still be found to be genetic I rather suspect, the jury is out, but the evidence is overwhelming. I predict exact mapping on the genome for all homosexually affecting bands within 25 years (no shock there, several university study groups have promised the same). There is some (though diminishing I suspect) possibility that the genes work in combination with chemical reactions in the womb. That is not yet completely clear -- that is why I say chemo-genetic.

So, evidence is that in fact homosexuality is NOT a choice, but a biological imperative, probably caused by genetics, but possibly by genetics mixed with chemical reactions. Homosexuality exists in nature, among species that do not reason -- and if you are of a literalistic religious bent -- cannot be said to have been touched by so called "original sin."

Nasty? I think straight sex is nasty personally. What isn't natural to us seems nasty. I have many straight friends though, so I don't care. I am sorry that you do.

Reynolds Jones
Schenectady, NY
http://www.rebuff.org

Answer 6

I won't get into any biological or psychological (or religious) discussion here. Let's just talk about the whole puzzle comparison... all the parts mentioned can fit together in various ways. If only one of those ways worked, then EVERYBODY would be heterosexual.

Answer 7

No, but you aparently like to be mean, rude, and stupid.

It must be nice to go home at the end of the day and say "I treated some total strangers like sh*t today, I tried to make them feel worthless and used the anonymity of the internet to spit in their faces in a deliberate attempt to be hurtful; I'm so awesome!" and sleep well that night.

However some of us have these things called ethics and morals that prevent us from being wantonly cruel to others. Some of us are familiar with concepts like kindness and respect. You should check it out sometime.

Answer 8

You're stupid I'm not even gay I'm a heterosexual woman, but who cares how gays do it. obvoiusly there's a lot of gay people out there and it's been this way since the beginning of humanity. It's not nasty to someone who is gay they like it, and I wouldn't mind trying out some girl on girl as long as she's not a bull dyke.

Answer 9

I'm with thwydwn on this one! Great answer!!
This is how I feel... The only thing different about homosexuals and myself is what we do in the privacy of our bedrooms. That is nobody's business!!! So, take your homophobic, ignorant, cowardly views elsewhere. You have been reported AGAIN for insulting others. Grow up!

Answer 10

I am happy with the way that I WAS BORN.... DON'T YOU SEE???

Why would I want to have sex with another woman, because I do... and if homosexuality was never meant to happen, it wouldn't exsist...

So let me answer your last question, in YOUR words...
I just like to be nasty...