Real History always become clear after centuries .May be today,s terrorist will be tomorrow Hero
2006-06-20 09:51:26 · 12 answers · asked by nostalgia786 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
all George Washington wanted is freedom from religious tyranny. all osama wants is all of our country and all of Americans dead. while he hides, he sends brainwashed agents willing to blow themselves up to do his dirty work.
even the 'osamas' of this world grow old and sick.
2006-06-20 09:54:34 · answer #1 · answered by the_shepherd's_child 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
George Washington led a revolt against the British because americans were being taxed too much without any representation. Osama Bin Laudin finances acts of disruption anywhere, against infidels. The only way anybody could see him as a hero would be to join his religous sect. There is no comparison possible.
2006-06-20 10:04:02 · answer #2 · answered by Marcus R. 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Um. George Washington became the First President years after the Declaration of Independance was issued. Not sure if you realize that GW did not sign the Dec. and wasn't one of the "founding fathers" - England had already lost the war - therefore, control of the colonies - before GW was made President.
Why don't you read up on US history prior to making Osama out to be a hero.
2006-06-20 10:07:01 · answer #3 · answered by dlil 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hmmmm.
George Washington was elected by the citizens as leader of a country that sought freedom to live as they see fit. Freedom of thought, freedom of Religion.....
Osama Bin Laden leads a stateless organization that uses terror and violence to impose his religous zeal upon the world.
Sure...if Fundamental Islam becomes the rule of the world ... men (the only ones that will have any relevance in such a world) will probably worship Osama Bin Laden as a Hero... much like Lenin and Stalin were held in such esteem during Soviet Times.
2006-06-20 10:01:48 · answer #4 · answered by gcbtrading 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
George Washington was a visible enemy to the British. He marched on a battle field and fought soldiers. Innocent civilians, including women and children, were not targets. I have a hard time recalling any "heros" from centuries ago that fought their war killing the innocent women and children along the way.
2006-06-20 10:00:34 · answer #5 · answered by goober 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Huge difference. Americans were upstarts whose roots came from their own country. Washington was not targeting civilians and forcing a religion down the throats of the populus.
2006-06-20 09:57:13 · answer #6 · answered by Padrefan 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Last time I looked, G Washington had not sent a group of killers into London to target thousands of innocent civilians.
2006-06-20 09:57:27 · answer #7 · answered by dewcoons 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
200 years ago, the British were actually trying to find Washington, and they invaded the country he actually lived in, unlike the case with Iraq
2006-06-20 09:57:59 · answer #8 · answered by Mr. October 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh really, did George Washington's spiritual advisor write religious justifications for killing women and children? How heroic.
An ahole stays an ahole no matter how hard you try to draw a moral equivalence to make it seem ok.
2006-06-20 09:56:34 · answer #9 · answered by simsta 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
George Washington did not bomb innocent civilians to further his cause, Osama did.
2006-06-20 09:55:16 · answer #10 · answered by davidmi711 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋