Have you seen that law, lol. It's great. They can't be within X amount of miles of a church, school, playground, etc. etc.
There is virtually nowhere they can go, except away.
2006-06-20 09:39:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Although I agree with the law, the ACLU does have a valid legal argument. There are not laws that say convicted car thieves cannot live or work near car dealerships. We single out child molesters after they have served their time, and we do not do it for all crimes, so the law is being unequally applied. Personally, I feel that child molesters should get far more severe penalties (life in prison) but until we can make the punishment fit the severity of the crimes, we need to accept that the system is flawed.
2006-06-20 16:27:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by The Krieg 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
90% of child molesters and sex offenders will commit a second sex crime once released from prison. I say just get rid of them on the first offense, that way we don't have to worry about the next life they would ruin and the tax payers money that will have to be used on a second trial.
Jessica Lunsford and many others would still be with their families if we would have just gotten rid of that trash in the first place.
Without these sex offenders, civil liberties groups wouldn't have these people to worry about. Maybe they should concentrate on helping the victims more.
2006-06-20 16:39:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by Huevos Rancheros 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Is this the Repuglicans agenda for
future political ads for their 08 Presidential erections?
A young girl featured in a controversial television ad during the 2000 presidential campaign testified this week that the man who developed the commercial molested her for years and forced her to watch pornography and use sex toys.
The girl, now 15, told jurors Carey Lee Cramer — a 44-year-old political consultant who gained national notoriety when he released an anti-Al Gore ad showing a young girl picking daisy petals and ending in a nuclear blast — began molesting her in the third grade, when she lived in Mercedes with him, his then-wife and her younger brother.
2006-06-20 18:38:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by BUSH IS A CLOWN 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
How do you relate these things? or is it like "Six Degrees" where you say, well, A civil liberties group contains a liberal, a liberal is in the democratic party, Hillary Clinton is in the democratic party, Hillary may run for president, and the presidential election needs an agenda!! I connected them! Yay!
2006-06-20 18:13:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mac Guru 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Don't forget these!!!
The liberal agenda;
•attack American traditions, specifically Christian traditions and the traditional American family
•engage in "get-even" policies that support discrimination when it benefits historically disadvantaged groups
•punish and/or discourage achievement through taxation and fiscal policies
•use the rulings of the Judicial branch of the government as de facto law, irrevocable by anything short of Constitutional amendment or a future court ruling, thus bypassing the legislative process. Roe V. Wade is the most frequently cited example of "judicial activism".
•weaken the military strength and morale of the country by vilifying the practice of armed combat and hesitating to use force when it appears necessary
•use regulatory bodies over private enterprise to accomplish social goals and restrict competition (government, education, labor)
•establish secular and progressive social policy, including support for gay marriage, abortion, liberal drug policy, euthanasia and prostitution legalization.
•implement a foreign policy supporting the protection of human rights and multiculturalism through activism and social intervention.
Those damn liberals!!!
2006-06-20 18:09:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by MishMash [I am not one of your fans] 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, it is just the beginning. I actually heard that Hillary's main platform is for more pedophiles in America. Of course, I'm sure the Republican Machine will somehow spin that into something negative.
2006-06-20 16:40:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Given that peice of work like you do NOTHING but paint 60% of America with the same brush I will say yes,I hope so.
a REAL lady is not so aceberic. Or dishonest,as you.
The clip is not "liberal".It's southern,sex with minors and all.
2006-06-20 16:25:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
What does a suit challenging a state statute have to do with the election of the president of the whole country, you fuc**ng moron?
2006-06-20 16:27:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by Mr. October 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
"Wah, wah, everyone who fights for civil rights is an evil lib!"
Why are you making this a partisan issue? It really isn't. When will you partisan sh!theads stop the mudslinging and actually stick to the issues, rather than spewing "you dumb con/lib"?
2006-06-20 16:27:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by eatmorec11h17no3 6
·
0⤊
0⤋