what I mean is that boys would be learning how to build and fix things and other tradionally male things and girls would take home economics classes and learning about what a woman should be. career choices would be segregated based on sex. Males working as a fashion designer or any other traditonally female job would be sent to specialed training schools to learn a traditonally male job and females who are in a traditonally male job would also be re-trained to adopt a more feminine job. gays and lesbians would be sent to ex gay ministries in an effort to change their sexual orientation. Bible study classes would be offered to the students and adults at local churches. those who participate will not have to pay taxes. those who would refuse to participate in the gender role education or training would be taxed heavily and be expelled from school or be fired from their job. do you think a law like this will bring harmony and normalcy back to america?
2006-06-20 08:35:18 · 23 answers · asked by ar2425 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
NO NO NO it would take away our freedom, something this country is founded on! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2006-07-03 18:10:06 · answer #1 · answered by # one 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
There is nothing wrong in what you have suggested. More elementary class teachers with women in classes will be a nice idea. Also combined with the present day requirements, with due regard to "Future Shock" of Alvin Toffler there would be more people in the entertainment business than those who would do physical work. Why should the women do the physical work when more opportunities are availabel elsewhere? This cannot be misconstrued that as male domination.
2006-07-04 01:07:08 · answer #2 · answered by sarayu 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
HELL NO!
I had to modify this because I went back and read your other questions and realized this is about you, not the other way around. So if you read my first answer, I apologize.
A person who believes in what you proposed would be a control freak that wants to destroy anyone who doesn't represent their EXTREMELY LIMITED view of life. They need to reaccess their values and motives and work on themselves rather than controlling others. Even the god they pretend to believe in would be against this. I will use their limited language to pose a new question: What would Jesus do? Definitely NOT what you are proposing.
2006-06-20 08:40:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sounds good to me. Bring back the days of parents raising their own children instead of a babysitter and teaching them right from wrong would be great. A woman watching after her children, cleaning the house while the husband is working hard all day to support his children would also be nice instead of John and Mike tying up our court systems trying to get married or adopt children. I'd vote for you.
2006-07-04 04:01:29 · answer #4 · answered by meansawbean 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
sure. Gender roles shrink a individual to steretypes. i think of infants could benift from mothers who're extra assertive and outstanding besides as father who're extra nuturing. Plus each and every person is born with distinctive skills. If a guy is a extra clever cook dinner and extra clever with infants, why make him artwork exterior the domicile. people ought to do what's maximum suitable for them. Plus removing gender roles does not propose all of us ought to act the comparable, it basically supply us techniques. If some women persons decide to the place makeup, and cook dinner. sturdy for them, I do exactly no longer think of we ought to constantly rigidity people to be a definite way.
2016-10-31 04:56:08 · answer #5 · answered by zubrzycki 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ofcourse not! I believe there is no basis for talent in anything based on gender. Also I would never discourage anyone from doing something they loved on this factor. Funny, we live in the land of opportunnity (USA) & people r always looking 2 make things run like communism.
2006-07-03 21:38:28 · answer #6 · answered by bec-n-wen 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well no cause i mean you have so much to choose from and well all women are not good at home economics and all men ain't good at fixing stuff so why have to take a class for something you cant or just don't like to do
2006-06-20 08:40:45 · answer #7 · answered by rye 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because the fifties was such a great era!
Not
Especially as it was followed by an era of social unrest. A return to such a society would be many giant steps backwards.
Check out the meaning of the word entropy.
2006-06-20 08:46:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hell no! Look at the Puritans... didn't work out so well, did it. Do you really want to bring back the witch hunts and paranoia that was rampant in those times? Most of the problems in this world have their roots in religion, historically and currently. If we were to completely remove religion from society, things would become more "normal" than they are now. (Notice I did not say remove laws, just religion.)
2006-06-20 08:39:17 · answer #9 · answered by Georgia 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What a load of garbage!
I feel that it should be spread in both direction, so a man knows how to cook a pot roast and a woman can do a tune up on her car.
Gender Specific. Why not call it what it is: Institutionalized Sexism!
2006-06-20 08:42:14 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
And what would single people do? My son washes and irons his clothes and my daughter mows her yard and keeps the oil checked on her car. What would you do if there is no one of the other sex to do a job for you? My husband is on commission, if I didn't work, sometimes we wouldn't be able to buy groceries.
2006-06-20 08:42:27 · answer #11 · answered by nursesr4evr 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋