Just answer the questions, without a bunch of rhetoric!?

Question

I want to know how 9/11 "non-conspiracy theorists" answer this:
1. WTC leaseholder, Larry Silverstein, ADMITTED in an interview that building 7, sustained no real damage, yet was purposely demolished with explosives. This takes, at least, weeks to plan.
2. Many firefighters heard multiple explosions around the WTC, and recognized that it seemed 1 & 2 were also planned demolitions. (they did fall at free-fall speed, watch replay)
3. No recognizable evidence was found that would indicate a plane crashed at the Pentagon, Pennsylvania. Representing the first two times in history that a plane completely disappeared after crashing, and why the Pentagon refuses to submit any real footage from the many cameras that would disprove any conspiracy theories.
4. Pres. Bush's bro., Marvin Bush, was head of security for the WTC before 9/11, and no security cameras were on that day.
5. Studies show the chances of making a cell call from obove 10,000 ft. is .006 (flight 93)

Any logical answers?

Answer 1

The shortest quickest easiest answer to this question that fulfills all of the above conditions while introducing the least amount of explanation ( applying Ockhams razor) is that 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB. TruthSeeker you rock!!

Answer 2

There seems to be a lot of speculation about 911. Around every corner new questions arise.
1. The morning of the attacks original reports identified 5 planes as being unaccounted for. Later federal authorities downgraded this to four. What happened to the fifth?
2. Why did Ahmed Alghamdi, who allegedly was on the United plane that hit the WTC purchase tickets for a flight the next day from Dulles Airport in DC to Saudi Arabia.
3. Isnt it odd that documents incriminatin bin Laden were found intact at the WTC although the bodies of hundreds of victims have never been found?
4. At least 12 Air Force and National Gaurd bases are within a few moments of the WTC and the Pentagon. Why werent fighter planes scrambled as soon as it became obvious that the airliners had been hijacked?
5. The passenger capacity of the four planes was 1328 passengers. Prior to 911 transcontinental flightsd were heavily booked. Why were the four planes only carrying only a total of 266 passengers-20% of their capacity?
6. Could a fire fed by 18,000 gallons of jet fuel-much of which was blown from the building when the planes hit-melt the concrete clad steel columns supporting each tower?

This is just to name a few. Like the JFK assasanation, we will never know the whole story in our lifetime.

Answer 3

3. No recognizable evidence was found that would indicate a plane crashed at the Pentagon, Pennsylvania. Representing the first two times in history that a plane completely disappeared after crashing, and why the Pentagon refuses to submit any real footage from the many cameras that would disprove any conspiracy theories.


My cousin was a professor at Georgetown and on Flight 77. If there was no plane crash, where is my cousin and why has no one in our family heard from her in almost 5 years?

The idea that the government made up the plane and its passengers just went into hiding seems an even bigger conspiracy theory to me.

Answer 4

Popular Mechanics had a great article debunking all the conspiracy theories about 9/11. It's the March 2005 issue.

Answer 5

NO. I would appriciate you stating your sources, so that I can read more into these facts. I lived less than a mile from the WTC, so have a real perspective. Nothing made sence.

GemtheWitch has an excelent point. Where are the people on the missing plane?

Answer 6

I'm not really into the 911 conspiracy thing but I do remember that morning on 9/11 when I was CNN. A CNN reporter actually stated, "..... there appears to have been something attached to the bottom of one of the planes....."

I never forgot that and have always wondered, ya know....

Answer 7

As to number 3, conspiracy theorists worldwide's worst nightmare came true last month when video was released of the plane hitting the pentagon:

Answer 8

We have all seen the pictures. I have seen people use their cellphones. Eye witnesses hear & see things that are not possible to exist. The explosions could be anything from light bulbs popping to transformers blowing. Even fireman get frightened it such a horrific situation. I bet you believe the Da Vinci theory too.

Answer 9

I see the point of the reply. i don't think of each baby needs a similar element of preparation,yet lack of understanding is risky. better,the competition in the unique question that agriculture,engineering and drugs will take priority is absurd. the position will the farmers,engineers and medical practitioners come from precisely? those practices do not merely materialize out of skinny air. and not using a formalized academic gadget there merely isn't farmers,engineers or medical practitioners to grant those facilities.

Answer 10

To illogical questions? These statements are inflammatory, but not well backed up. Have any evidence, or is a lack of evidence really all that's needed for a good conspiracy theory?