So pathetic. She'll do anything to expose her boobs.
2006-06-20 06:55:28 · 9 answers · asked by Paige 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
I think it's good she wants to fight for animal rights. She has the right idea, but the wrong way of going about it. Is that even legal? All she's going to accomplish is a lot of horny men staring at her.
2006-06-20 07:01:31 · answer #1 · answered by amloompa21 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't think Pam being naked in London is really going to sway legislation in the US. But I suppose she has the right to do what she wants... She also petitioned the state of Kentucky to remove a statue of Colonel Sanders from the Capital because of the inhumane way the KFC treats chickens...
2006-06-20 07:47:57 · answer #2 · answered by In the light 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont' know how many of you have actually ever listened to a real Pamela Anderson interview not one where she is promoting something but one about her, she is actually not stupid. She has been a big supporter of PETA for a very long time, and doesn't wear leather or fur. She has some very famous shots of her self for one of their adds wearing lettuce leaves. She is also a vegetarian. I think she should be commended for sticking to her guns with things alot of celebrities say oh yeah I support that and don't do a thing...she actually does support animal rights.
2006-06-20 07:07:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The final time I observed 'the excellent' do lots harm it replace into the Berlin riots that ended up with the Jewish community being pushed into Ghettos. This bring about six million Jewish people being exterminated in concentration camps - a extra 4 million Gypsies, homosexuals, east Europeans being thrown in for sturdy success. Then I observed primary united states of america being swamped with money for a drugs commerce we could no longer flow away out Vietnam ... the main ridiculous conflict ever fought and lost by making use of good wing individuals. Did I say maximum ridiculous? Hush my mouth, I meant the Iraq conflict ... the seek for WMDs a conflict against the rights wings known dictator ... Saddam ... a known till he stopped taking part in ball. yet we could expand our horizons we ought to? The KKKs uninterrupted lynching of Black u . s . a . electorate. no longer confident? Jings! you're difficult artwork! we could word the apartheidt equipment in South Africa. no longer adequate? ok we could flow with the planned destruction of the united kingdom production base by making use of Margeret Thatcher just to weaken the capacity of the Unions ..finally optimum to the cutting-edge mess the united kingdom financial equipment is in. each and all of the strikes of the excellent wing.
2016-10-31 04:47:09 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I heard about it here, from you.
Good job on the advertising for this.
I don't see how this is pathetic. She's standing up for what she believes in and getting her message out. You heard it right? Now you're telling this community. Raising awareness and perhaps enlisting supporters, swaying legislation, she's just another lobbyist.
2006-06-20 07:03:15 · answer #5 · answered by csucdartgirl 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Really, she'd do anything for some attention...
2006-06-20 07:33:10 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
amen...like she really cares about animal rights
2006-06-20 06:58:53 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
omigod! what if she scares the animals?
2006-06-20 06:58:48 · answer #8 · answered by JLT 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
sweet, where can i get pictures.
2006-06-20 06:59:29 · answer #9 · answered by danzahn 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋