English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i aint gay iight

2006-06-20 06:53:53 · 29 answers · asked by reggeaqueen09 1 in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

29 answers

Hey if gay people want to be miserable like the rest of us, I say go ahead.

2006-06-20 06:54:46 · answer #1 · answered by TheAnomaly 4 · 0 0

First who asked this question is highly stupid. Yes I said it you are stupid! Second for all the people who said no because of their religious beleif needs to get a life. Stop using your religion to run other peoples lifes! While doing that GET a life. I personaly am not a big supporter of a child having two moms or two dads but if a homosexual or a lesbian wants a child thats their decision, not YOURS. Also please keep in mind that not EVERYONE beleives in God or whatever religions out there. So respect their wishes and leave them alone and stop giving them b.s. for what they want to do with their lives. Like someone said earlier, if they want to have a miserable life then go ahead! And for all staright people, well people against homo's and lesbo's get a life, your not God, and people are FREE to beleive what they want and DO what THEY WANT. I would say something else but it wouldnt be very appropriate for some of those immature losers out there. And no I'm not a lesbian, I'm just OPEN-MINDED, something Americans should learn how to be.

2006-06-20 07:05:58 · answer #2 · answered by bapesta_baby01 2 · 0 0

I am not sure why people behave gay. i think this is only excuse for them to have something they cannot if they are in a real boy girl relationship. I would say it is nice if they sponsor a kid rather than have kids under their shelter, because think about it, kids are orphaned for a number of reasons, and then for them to get involved under the shelter of twisted people is very unfare. Moreover if they wish to have kids, then they should have a normal relationship or be single. Also, if the world had to be of gays, God would only create men or only women. Everything if for a reason. If there were only gays, there would be no kids.

2006-06-20 06:58:45 · answer #3 · answered by charmaine m 2 · 0 0

I don't think there's any reason a gay individual, or couple, should be barred from having children. There are certainly no sound psychological studies that show such an arrangement would be detrimental in any way.

I have, of course, seen it argued that the children would be deprived of either a male or female role model - but one doesn't have to be a parent in order to be a role model. Good friends, other family members... there are plenty of ways to ensure that children have all the role models, of each sex, that they need to grow up as happy, well-adjusted, adults.

2006-06-20 06:57:20 · answer #4 · answered by weofui 2 · 0 0

I was watching Family Guy just Sunday night, and they were talking about gay marriage and stuff. I'm with Peter, Gay people have all the right to be just a miserable and unhappy as the rest of us do.

2006-06-20 06:59:59 · answer #5 · answered by Weda B 1 · 0 0

Thats a tough question. Do you think that some straight people are worthy of having children? Alot of them arent however the government lets them spread their legs over and over again.

And yes, i think that gay people should be able to have kids.

2006-06-20 06:58:17 · answer #6 · answered by Jared H 1 · 0 0

Yes I think it would be totally fine. There are a lot of gay couples with kids now and the kids are 100% ok.

TheAnomaly's message was funny as hell, haha!

2006-06-20 06:56:41 · answer #7 · answered by DiRTy D 5 · 0 0

If they are two loving, caring people who wish to raise a child to the best of their combined capabilities, then yes, just as they should be given the right to marriage they should be given the right to have/adopt children.

2006-06-20 06:57:39 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

no because for the child's sake growing up would be horrible. think of what the child's friends parents would think. i know someone who's in this situation and, unfortunately some parents wont let there kids go over there house.

2006-06-20 06:58:57 · answer #9 · answered by lovesugarkisses 4 · 0 0

Well having gay parents is better than having no parents, don't you think?

I mean it's better for kids to form bonds and attachments to people who WANT them than it is for them to be abussed or neglected in orphanages.

*sigh* Who cares if they are gay, as long as they love their children...As long as they are good parents, I'm all for it!

2006-06-20 06:57:55 · answer #10 · answered by Corn_Flake 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers