is the sexual life necessary? is there another way of reproduction?

Answer 1

The sexual life has its pros and cons, both of which are pretty evident when you stop and look around. Is it necessary? I guess that depends on one's needs, doesn't it?

Is there another way of reproduction? Well, yeah. You could go to an arts and crafts store and grab some stuff off the shelves, go home and put something together. Another option is to dig up fresh cadavers and have someone like Bill Gates front you the equipment for a mad scientist's lab and go from there. You could use a Xerox machine, or some tracing paper. And if all of those options aren't good enough for you, you could always go to a clinic and have them mess around with some so-called technology that is supposed to be able to accomplish through unnatural means what God has blessed people to do naturally.

Just a thought - if it don't fit, don't force it.

Answer 2

Sexual life is not necessary. For humans and numerous other species sex is needed to reproduce. But there are many other ways of reproduction. Asexual reproduction where microscopic organisms split into 2. Also willow trees grow from cuttings, dandelions produce seeds that are clones of themselves,virgin greenfly give birth to virgin greenfly that are already pregnant. So it's interesting to think of why we need sex and don't reproduce another way. Sure it's pleasurable, but it's pleasurable to ensure that people reproduce. If it didn't feel good people wouldn't do it and then the human species woule become extinct. However sex results in a comibination of genes and leads to more variety in the species, which can lead to better chances of survival.

Answer 3

In vitro fertilization does not require sexual intercourse for the union of male and female gametes. The fertilized egg is reimplanted into the mother and develops normally. This process simulates the end result of sexual reproduction in a laboratory setting, but asexual reproduction is impossible for the human species.

Answer 4

Sexual reproduction is when two members of the same species (usually make and female) share their genes to create offspring. Even test tube babies are produced sexually, as it involves mixing the genes from a mother and father.


Some other organisms can reproduce asexually - they produce clones of themselves. All bacteria do this (they just split themselves in half), and some plants like dandelions and strawberries can also do this.

Answer 5

sexual life is necessary to pleasure one another but was really made for reproduction. i dont think there is another way of reproduction but if there was that would be pretty cool.

Answer 6

Well, sure. There's asexual reproduction, common in one-celled organisms. But you don't get a whole lot of diversity that way and species tend to become rather prone to disease and changes in environment.

And it's not as much fun.

Answer 7

Sexual life is not necessary... there are sperm banks now....

::ooh ahh::

Sex is a necessity not only for reproduction, but pleasure and release of pressure....

Answer 8

Of course sex isn't necessary. You can always conceive a baby in a test tube and implant it into a surrogate mother to reproduce. No intercourse necessary!

Whether or not that's how you want to live is a different story. No sex?!?!?

Answer 9

Necessary for who? It is necessary for me! But not for an amoeba or hydra. There are other means of reproduction, i.e. mitosis, budding, etc.

Answer 10

There are sperm banks for people who would rather do it that way, and then test tube babies. But wouldn't that take the fun out of baby making?