My choice would be world peace as that is called by man while cancer is is a devastating but natural disease.
2006-06-20 06:18:13 · 25 answers · asked by twiggy 2 in Social Science ➔ Sociology
world peace. Everyone's going to die, but I'd like my life, no matter how long, to be enjoyable, and then if I got cancer, people would take care of me. Oh yeah, and all of the scientists working on biological weapons could concentrate on curing cancer
2006-06-20 06:21:49 · answer #1 · answered by hichefheidi 6 · 2⤊ 5⤋
World Peace.
2006-06-20 06:21:45 · answer #2 · answered by flame_alchemist 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would go cure for cancer, at least I know what I'd get--a disease gone, and who knows what I'd learn about helping the human body survive.
World peace could be arranged by having a totalitarian world dictator that oppressed people into a lack of war.
Overall, I'd choose the cure, but just my thoughts.
2006-06-20 06:23:13 · answer #3 · answered by Todd 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A cure for cancer would lead to world peace, as war is caused by suffering.
2006-06-20 06:22:33 · answer #4 · answered by PALADIN 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We are choosing here. I'd take a cure for cancer. I know wars are rageing all over the world, but free will was bestowed on us by the powers that be. The human is capable of world peace if he/she wants it. Obviously we don't. I'd cure cancer.
2006-06-21 04:21:14 · answer #5 · answered by Secret Squirrel 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cancer. A cure for cancer is more likely than any type of peace.
2006-06-20 06:34:49 · answer #6 · answered by Heather 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cancer because I think people deserve a second chance and don't deserve to be robbed of life from some disease. World peace will happen eventually, according to the bible it is the end of time. That scares me but there's nothing we can do about it.
2006-06-20 06:26:20 · answer #7 · answered by dale6956 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
peace! Because if we had world peace we could work out and evntually solve all the other problems by getting together and working on them. But if you only cured cancer people would still hate and kill each other. As the scriptures say: "better a little with love than a fattened calf (ie fulfilled desires) with hate"
2006-06-20 06:22:30 · answer #8 · answered by T. Watcher 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would choose World Peace. As devastating as Cancer is, there is treatment and, with early detection, hope and possibly a cure. As for war and terrorism there is no cure or hope.
2006-06-20 06:22:30 · answer #9 · answered by MissSubversive 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
World peace. A cure for cancer is realistically attainable, but world peace isn't... so I'll go for that.
2006-06-20 06:21:43 · answer #10 · answered by psykhaotic 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would choose world peace, because then the world's scientists can get together and find a cure for cancer, and other such problems.
2006-06-20 06:22:04 · answer #11 · answered by Hola there! 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋