2006-06-20 05:43:53 · 37 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
He already IS getting us killed, 2,500 American soldiers, several hundred more from the "Coalition of the Willing", and countless thousand of Iraqis. If he really goes crazy and starts nuking people, like Iran, well, we're all in trouble then, everyone in the whole world.
All of those Iraqis did nothing to us before we attacked them (although I am sure that now every single one of them hates us and wants us dead, Thanks alot, George). And Osama is still out there!
2006-06-20 05:58:51 · answer #1 · answered by Bartmooby 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bush didn't fly the planes into the World Trade Center and Pentagon, and Al Quaeda's plans were in the works when Clinton was president.
It sucks that there are lots of nasty people out there who want to kill Christians and Westerners, but it's not the fault of the people trying to fight it.
I hate war, and I have family serving in Iraq and I really wish they weren't there, but it's not a fight Bush picked.
2006-06-20 05:48:26 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think he is one of the few politicians hwo has always stood between us and getting killed. We have to fight, so to all you hippy peace loving people consider this. if we didn't have people fighting over there keeping us safe you couldn't have this freedom to say something like that.
Listen up for the peace cryers: "Is life so dear or peace so sweet as to be bought at the price of chains and slavery? I know not what course others may take but as for me, give me liberty or give me death."---Patrick Henry. Are you willing to let that go for a President who is so consumed with stats that he/she will change all plans at the drop of a hat so they can stay the most popular boy or girl in the class. Not me
2006-06-20 06:00:39 · answer #3 · answered by upcoming_author 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That question is a little extreme. I don't think you have anything to worry about unless YOU join the military and defend our country and the countries of the less fortunate.
And 2009 scares me because we may get a fool in there trying to be the SAVIOR (from bush) and really screw things up.
2006-06-20 05:48:46 · answer #4 · answered by Loo 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not I. I think the hidden antiballistic missiles we have will protect us.
You know, Al Quida made its first attack on the World Trade Center in 1993 and then there was the attack on the USS Cole when President Clinton was President. And what about the attack on our troops who were billeted in Saudi Arabia in an apartment building in the early 1990s.
2006-06-20 05:47:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont think so!
In fact, he had Zawrquari on the run, when he was in Iraq! And with a strong President, like he is, who is willing to go to war and protect people of different Countries, then people will stand up and take notice of us even more!
Take North Korea, they now have a missle that can reach the US. If we let them launch it, and it is a success, then we may be at war with them eventually. (They are basically trying to shake us down, for all they can get, so, if our President decides we need to go to war with them, then we will finish the Korean War all these years later, one way or another.
Iran wants nukes, and they WILL give or sell them to Terrorist, that will blow us to kingdom come..(you can betcha on that one!). So, they must be stopped for the Worlds good, and not just ours.
If they think we will invade them, because we are going to be done with Iraq soon, (the sooner the better, so that they will 'KNOW' that we have the resources at hand to invade them, they will stop thier nonesense and give up the want of nukes then.
A strong war President is what we are in need of at this time, some one who isnt afraid to go to task with different Governments and not back down in times of crisis, like the Democrats are at this time, talking about.
Though, I am a Christian, I must support my President, as I would support my Masters, as the Bible states that I should. (Am I for war? No, I am not for killing of anyone, but, I shall do what I am called to do, as my LORD would have me do)...
I wish you well..
Jesse
2006-06-20 05:53:27 · answer #6 · answered by x 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He already is, last time i looked at Iraq..
Next up Iran..then North Korea...whose next..Syria? Probably.
The guy is a wanker.
And why is it that the US assumes a North Korean missile will even be fired at the US...Guilty till proven innocent huh...
Give me a break.. 9/11 was domestic terrorism and all this crap now is the result of a madman. But most of you are too close minded to even get the hint, because you sit on your *** and watch American Idol while fuelling your SUV and then whining to me about GAS prices.
2006-06-20 05:48:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not a very clear question. Do you mean our servicemen and women in Iraq, or us here in the US? And some of the answers I see posted here. Is our world really this clueless? Why do any of you even comment? Offer some answers instead of constant uninformed, idiotic garbage for once.
2006-06-20 06:01:05 · answer #8 · answered by Nani 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
'President' Bush is already getting us killed!
2006-06-20 05:47:30 · answer #9 · answered by jsimpkinsv2002 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont know about getting us killed (us in the US) but he is doing a good job of getting our soldiers slaughtered. I also cant wait til 2009
2006-06-20 05:47:16 · answer #10 · answered by debra_har 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋