If Los Angelos was bombed, would celebrities still be liberal?

Question

Sharp Marble, I like your thinking.

So uh...Jackson, do you care to answer the question?

Answer 1

Maybe they'd all be dead from the bombing and we wouldn't have to worry about them.

Answer 2

Yeah, that's right. The country would be much better off if fellow countrymen who disagree with were the pro-"war" faction were killed.

So concerned with bringing "freedom" to Iraq, so intolerant of your own countrymen who exercise those same freedoms. That's not too hypocritical, is it? What does freedom mean to you and some of these folks, anyway? The freedom to only agree?

The problem here is that pro'war" people want their little "war" and for EVERONE to like it too.

Well, there was more than one way to respond to the events of 9/11 (and BTW, how many Iraqis or Afghans flew planes into the WTC, etc?). W chose to answer violence with misdirected violence (where again is Osama Bin Laden and do you remember him?). Others felt that violence might cause more harm than good. The pro-violence folks got their way, and appeased their base need for revenge (on someone arabic, even if it isn't Bin Laden). As a consequence, they have dissipated all the good will the US was given on 9/12/2001, witnessed the death of 3000 US troops and thousands of innocent Iraqis, and have created a long line of new terrorists in training. That's just the short term.

Furthermore, you have sucked the US into a "war" where your leader cannot even define what constitutes a "victory." Without a standard for determining when the "war" should be considered over, the US is either doomed to interminable involvement (and deaths) or surrender. Simply saying victory is won when "terrorism" is defeated is laughably absurd. "Terror" is an emotion. "Terrorism" is a means employed by people to influence others. It has existed throughout time. It will never be completely eradicated. What are you going to do? Kill every radical muslim? That's gonna take a while and a lot more dead american soldiers.

There is no game plan. Your leader has failed to define the criteria for determining "victory." Its not the troops' fault, it is Bush's.

Answer 3

The Celebrities would blame the Government on "not protecting us" LOL!!

They would wail the plight of Americans that have been traumatised at the bombing of L.A. And demand "rights" to saftey and bewail the Government that "they" didnt care about thier Citizens, and left us in harms way.

Celebrities are a pampered bunch, and I dont listen to them, as they are the only ones in the World, who dont get it! They make millions of dollars for a picture and can live for the rest of thier lives like Kings and Queens, for a few months work!! While the rest of us slave away at a regular job, and pay our taxes and volunteer for the Military and all sorts of things like that, while Celebrities live the "good life".

Celebrities can go back in thier boxes and not be heard from again, as far as I am concerned. They dont have the right to complain about anything! Go have thier parties and get drunk and doped up and lose thier minds....

I wish you well..

Jesse

Answer 4

Yeah, it's just what we call "liberal" would be different. We pay enough attention to them to make what they say look like reality. Some celbrities are O.K. (Tom Hanks, I think is right on) but too many are self indulgent dingbats.
Being bombed by the bad guys is likely the only way they'd change their views. It'd be considered "swank" to have a hawkish outlook. More likely, it'd be labelled "liberal" to be for retribution.

Answer 5

Yes.
New York was bombed and the celebrities there are still liberal.

Answer 6

You apparently have a wacked out definition of what liberal means. Perhaps reading a book would suit you better than the TV.

Answer 7

New York was attacked and voted overwhelmingly for Kerry. A lot of celebrities live here also. Does that answer your question?

Answer 8

no they would stand behind the president and talk about how america is united and blah blah blah! remember when the towers were hit? the whole country stood behind the president for months and then after a while, when things weren't going the way they expected or hoped...they started trashing him again.

Answer 9

Would u still be a di*k Head if u were born in Iraq and Kept in Abu Ghraib?

Answer 10

i don't think that celebrities are the only ones who lives in L.A..
but who cares in what they say?
probably they have so much power because some people need something else in their life and are obsessed with what they are doing.
what a waste

Answer 11

You would still have Madonna whosi in England and then of course Alec who is doing that laugher of a show in Philly. If they all died, who we would we make fun of?