How many of you believe that Iraq was responsible for the 9/11 attack?

Answer 1

PAY ATTENTION TO THE MIDDLE AREA OF THIS QUOTE:


"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. {{{{He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members.}}}} It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

http://www.snopes.com/politics/war/wmdquotes.asp

AND FOR THOSE OF YOU THAT SAY THE INTELLIGENCE WAS RIGGED BY BUSH, HERE IS SOMETHING FROM BEFORE HE WAS IN OFFICE:

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999.

(same link)

Answer 2

Everyone knows that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. Neither did Afghanistan or Bin Ladin. Anyone who pays attention knows that he denied any involvement soon after 9/11, and any new evidence that states the contrary is a scam. Why would he change his story now? He didn't. Some scam artist claims that a tape recently surfaced that had Bin Ladin mentioning that he personally hand-picked all 19 hijackers. What a joke! Especially knowing the BBC News reported that at least 4 of the so-called hijackers that were supposed to have been involved with 9/11 have been seen in various parts of the middle-eastern world after 9/11. Visit American-Freedom.org to find out who really was behind the 9/11 events.

Answer 3

Iraq had absolutely nothing to do with 9/11 attack.

Answer 4

Well, let's see, it's no secret that Al Qaeda was training in Iraq. Zarqawi, for one, was already in Iraq before our intervention.

Whether Saddam was directly responsible for 9/11, I do not know, but what I do know is that after 9/11, with the intelligence information we had, how could we sit idly by and take a chance with Hussein? ..It has been reported just this week that Saddam was trying to get nukes from his pal in North Korea. Please don't paint Saddam as this innocent guy who just got bullied around. He is an insane brutal, scheming, horrible man.

Again, I do think Saddam had direct links with Al Qaeda, therefore, INDIRECT links to 9/11...

Answer 5

Yeah, and Bin Laden is a real threat to the world *sighs*. Their was never a connection with Al Qaeda in iraq, until we pushed them into each others arms. Iraq wasnt responsible for the attacks, Mossad wasnt responsible for the attacks, so leave the crack-pot conspiracy theory rubbish well alone.

Answer 6

Iraq was not responsible for the 9/11. It was Afghanistan, because this is where Osama Bin Laden is from innit.

Answer 7

Directly, probably not. Indirectly, yes. By supplying terrorists with weapons, money, safe haven, and bomb making experts Iraq under Saddam Hussein made a large contribution to terrorist activities. Interpret whatever facts you want, deny the one's that don't fit your theories. The rest of America will keep fighting for you.

Answer 8

George Bush (Sr) was having lunch with Osama Bin Ladin's dad when 9/11 hit. Old family friends. The military industrial complex has made billions of $$$ on this. Sounds suspitious to me...

Answer 9

Its possible that there was some terrorists or a terrorist cell in Iraq that helped. But you also need to rembember that we arn't aginst the populas of Iraq, it agianst the people that are trying to spread fear across the country and other countries for their own personal gain.

Answer 10

Iraq was not responsible for the attacks. Bin Ladden was, but Saddam was a really big financial branch to alquida. So it was thought that if they cut that branch off it would hurt Bin Laddens' pocket book. (sorry don't know who tho spell name.)