English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Better than being an orphan, I'm sure.

2006-06-20 03:30:44 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music Celebrities

19 answers

I am a foster parent and I think Celebs who are not very good parents or prove not to be shouldn't have kids in the first place. even if they have a nanny for them. Foster kids will tell you that they don't care if their parents argue , drink or do drugs as long as they don't abuse them they want to live with them and spend time with them So0o0o no nanny please just love me! Who cares if you adopt them or not as long as YOU raise them. We just adopted a son. We have 2 of our own children the youngest is 18 I am 38 and we adopted a 6 yr old boy the first of many! There are a lot of celeb that spend quality time with their kids Bon Jovi, Angelina and Brad many many more its a shame we only hear about the bad parenting!

2006-06-20 03:34:19 · answer #1 · answered by c0mplicated_s0ul 5 · 4 0

Excellent point. Indeed, though the celebs do adopt kids and suggest other people do likewise, how much time do they actually spend with the kids when the cameras aren't around? For that matter, how many diapers does Angelina Jolie or Brad Pitt actually change?

2006-06-20 10:35:28 · answer #2 · answered by Shadar 4 · 0 0

Those kids get a home and lots of toys but no real parents. Those that think Angelina is a hands on parent, think again. When the cameras are off and the attention is on Britney you can bet the kids are shoved into Nanny's hands and Brad gets her total attention.

2006-06-20 10:47:05 · answer #3 · answered by kitkat 7 · 0 0

There are so many people out there who are not celebrities having someone raise their kids that it is disgusting.............at least with money the celeb kids will be able to have and do things regular kids do not................I think the reason so many kids and adults are generally messed up is from lack of family values

2006-06-20 10:34:47 · answer #4 · answered by sweetblonde 6 · 0 0

To raise children now a days dont live in Bergen County New Jersey or New York, parents will have the better of the chances.
DYFS services know how to hurt people emotionally, when it comes down to "mental screening and security" why must we take away "you" from "you" unfairly says us, and our neverending court followups ?

2006-06-20 10:43:37 · answer #5 · answered by haroldthe4th 1 · 0 0

An excellent point! By the way, who really cares what celebrities do any way? I think I have more important things to do like watch the grass grow in my front yard or count the numbers of fur my dog sheds in an hour.

2006-06-20 11:34:31 · answer #6 · answered by irishharpist 4 · 0 0

I don't know why too many people would care about it. It could be that the celebs want to try to make themselves look like good people, or it could be the media will report on anything about celebreties now days. If a celebrety has a hangnail, we know about it.

2006-06-20 10:35:57 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The only reason that the ordinary slobs would be interested in what the celebs are up to, is they idolize them. Celebs are sometimes worse examples of humanity than usual, so it's not wise to look up to them...

2006-06-20 10:35:34 · answer #8 · answered by mrearly2 4 · 0 0

Yes it is and ,for example, Angelina Jolie seems to be a pretty hands on Mom and quite devoted to her kids.
I think it just irks some parents that celebrities are able to have domestic help.
They want it too and are jealous.

2006-06-20 10:36:22 · answer #9 · answered by Ragdollfloozie is Pensive! 7 · 0 0

Because some do not have people to take care of them and they almost drop them (brittany) or let them wonder outside to balconies (Eric Clapton). They are not always the most responsible people when they realize that they are America's royal family.

2006-06-20 10:45:22 · answer #10 · answered by jessica 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers