Does anyone else but me think it's strange that we still haven't seen a picture of Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes's daughter, Suri, yet? All the other celebrities have had professional pictures shown on covers of magazines looking very proud of their new offspring. What's with Tom & Katie then? It makes you wonder if there's something wrong with the baby. Maybe they're just being overly protective. What do you think?
2006-06-20 01:53:51 · 8 answers · asked by cynthiajean222 6 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
it is different but when you consider tom gave his immediate family classes on how to handle his new baby - you can see he wouldnt want all kinds of people around his baby - eventually a photo of this little girl will surface they cant hide her away forever.
2006-06-20 01:56:29 · answer #1 · answered by aeriolf 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
They are making her out to be like some little goddess or something. She's a baby !! Katie is not the first to have one and she surely won't be the last!! If everybody would stop acting like they are feining to see that baby, tom and katie would have her all over the place in everybody's face. As long as photographers are sitting around waiting to catch a glimpse of the baby who cries and poops like all the others, they are going to keep her a mystery. So what, they have a baby, he!!, I had four of them. :D
2016-05-20 04:32:33 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
My theory: They didn't actually have a baby. Did anyone else notice that Katie got too big too quickly, and that the bump was actually *smaller* at the end of her pregnancy than it was at month 7?
2006-06-22 06:22:34 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The two of them are probably fighting over what to do with the money if they sell the picture to a magazine!
2006-06-20 02:02:14 · answer #4 · answered by mj216 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that the child is black or asian or something that shows that it is not really tom cruises child and that katie has been sleeping around with other guys...
2006-06-20 01:56:48 · answer #5 · answered by TrippleThreat 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that they deserve privacy. If they don't want to have a picture of their new born plastered all over the news then that should be their right as human beings.
2006-06-20 01:55:44 · answer #6 · answered by allenlynn23 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Aside from their right to privacy, its quite possibly a Scientology dealio. L Ron Hubbard might repossess her if she is subjected to the noise and bustle of a photo shoot
2006-06-20 01:59:17 · answer #7 · answered by cripes_almighty 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who cares they are both a couple of NUTjobs anyway...
2006-06-20 01:56:13 · answer #8 · answered by bill s 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋