English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

9 answers

George Bush is the one who needs to apologize to both the Iraqi citizens and the American citizens. By invading a sovereign nation that DID NOT attack us, Bush led an illegal, unconstitutional war that has killed tens of thousands of Iraqi citizens and 2,500 U.S. soldiers.

An apology is insufficient. Bush should also be impeached, and then tried of high treason. If convicted, he should face a firing squad for the atrocities he condoned as Commander-In-Chief of the U.S. armed forced. As Harry Truman once said, "The buck stops here." Bush needs to accept full responsibility for the massacre and carnage he initiated.

George Bush attacked Iraq for two reasons: 1) He wanted to 'get even' with Hussein for humiliating George H.W. Bush during Desert Storm, and 2) Dick Cheney wants all the oil that swims underneath Iraqi sands. Those are the ONLY two reasons we're engaged in this murderous war.

The USA will never withdraw from Iraq until Dick Cheney has a rock-solid, iron-clad deal in place to get all of Iraq's oil.

Bush, a spoiled rich kid, has never had to be accountable for anything he's ever done in his wretched life. He got out of a drunk-driving charge thanks to his father's influence. He got out of military service, thanks to his father's accommodations. He was elected president, thanks to his father's ability to steal an election through fraud and manipulation of the Supreme Court.

Bush, a former drug user and chronic alcohol abuser, has not had to live up to any responsibility - ever. So why should it bother him that he has been responsible for so many deaths?
Isolated from reality and protected by the most corrupt, evil, incompetent U.S. Congress ever to occupy the Capitol Building, Bush can play 'cowboy' and act as 'macho' as he sees fit.

Check out BUSHWACKER! - a new blog at www.blogger.com http://al-aback.blogspot.com

Of course, George Bush will never apologize. He is committed to turning America into a third-world police state where common citizens are suspect and you are presumed guilty until proven innocent. Bush has one other concern: make sure the wealthy and rich individuals, powerful corporations, lobbyists, and special interest groups all get special attention so they can continue to funnel vast amount of dollars into the GOP coiffers.

History will remember George H. Bush as the dumbest man ever to be elected President, to date, in this country. His deer-in-the-headlights look gives him away everytime. He knows he's lying to you, and his beady little eyes demonstrate that he expects, anyday now, that some avid card-carrying NRA member will shoot him right between the eyes. Bush has brought shame to the American people, and has devastated our democracy. We don't need his apology; but we'll need years of rebuilding to repair all the damage he's done.

The sad fact is that there is no bright alternative on the horizon (neither Republican or Democrat). Politicians today only care about enriching themselves and getting re-elected, the American people be damned. Until that hubris and arrogance is stopped and replaced with a genuine desire to become a true public servant, Americans will continue to wallow in a cesspool of political swampland. Like lawyers, if politicians were thrown into a marshy, stinking swamp, even the pondscum would throw them back!

2006-06-20 00:14:25 · answer #1 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 1 1

No, America needs to appear united, if the next president apologizes and we still have troops in Iraq that would be a recipe for disaster. As much as I hate the current president, I don't think that anyone other than himself should apologize, and certainly not to the world, maybe to the US people.

2006-06-19 23:52:41 · answer #2 · answered by peachmonk 4 · 0 0

No, he shouldn't. It wastes time and it's a hypocritical move to appologise for another's behavior.

He should just do well to right Bush's wrongs as much as possible by moves such as gradually withdraw from Iraq both militarily and economically, while offering non-refundable loans to private iraqi companies for rebuilding, start unconditional negotiations with Iran which should be based on the NPT, close down Guantanamo Bay detention facility, renews its UNICEF and UN membership.

2006-06-19 23:52:56 · answer #3 · answered by elven_rangers 5 · 0 0

Acknowledging the blunders made through your predecessors and promising to take all proper moves to maximum recommendations-blowing those blunders the position plausible will be proper. yet Humiliating the rustic will be a ineffective empty gesture. human beings say that usa is conceited. What they propose is that usa is effectual. they do no longer hate what we do, yet what we are able to. They worry what they can't administration. This international rash of usa Bashing is rooted in worry. even if that is an irrational worry that once excercised becomed a self relaxing worry. They whant to convey us low so that they received't be afraid. we make sure to proceed to exist intense on a thanks to proceed to be unafraid. They attack us to convey us down we attack them to proceed to exist proper. that is a viscious circle. All because human beings worry what they can't administration. even if it truly is human nature.

2016-11-15 00:32:48 · answer #4 · answered by gorczynski 4 · 0 0

nope , the next president should sign-up to the international court and put Bush on trial..

2006-06-20 00:28:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No.He will have to aplogigize to inncoent Americans killed and their families sacrificed for BUSH"s self interest in Iraque entaglement

2006-06-19 23:53:33 · answer #6 · answered by leowin1948 7 · 0 0

for what not killing more terrorist and letting the democrats slow down what needs to be done

2006-06-20 00:11:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

nope, he should start out as if he was the better choice

2006-06-20 00:05:47 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

NO BUSH IS TRYING TO SAVE OUR A-S FROM GETTING BLOWN UP

2006-06-20 01:37:37 · answer #9 · answered by MIKE B 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers