If a clean H bomb was in the hands of the USA and Russia, what would be the consequences for the world?

Question

(A clean H bomb, perhaps made with 'metallic hydrogen', would be destructive but not radioactive, so it would pollute the area in which it would explode)...

Typing mistake : the place bombed would NOT be radioactive, and therefore be either occupiable and rebuildable...

Answer 1

It would mean less hesitation to attack, because there would be no radiation afterwards, the now surendered place could rebuild right away

Answer 2

It doesn't appear to me that your question even makes sense...

It would be destructive but not radioactive so it would pollute the area in which it would explode...?

With what would it pollute the area of detonation? Did you mean to say "would NOT pollute"?

I am assuming you mean that the US or Russia would possess a nuclear-level weapon that would leave a place inhabitable after killing all the people there? I thought neutron bombs were capable of doing that, for decades? It didn't mean that we launched unprovoked first strikes all this time, now did it?

The concept of Mutually Assured Destruction (M.A.D.) is believed to have been what kept the Cold War from turning Hot for like 50 years or more. What are you worried about? You should be less worried about the U.S., which is clearly NOT in the game for global domination (think COBRA from G.I. Joe), otherwise we'd have been knocking over countries left and right during all the time we've been the top world power. No, you should be worried about people who think God tells them to blow innocent people up for being the wrong religion: I'm talkin' about the ******' psychotic sick-phuck rabid dog muslims of the world who are THE thing that makes life on earth a ******' miserable pile of sh!t these days.

Soccer boy, what the hell are you talking about? Your answer reads like incoherent ramblings. And if you think that if the U.S. and Russia were blown up that the world would just live in la-la-la peace all over the place, you are retarded. Who would replace the billions of dollars the U.S. gives to rat hole countries where the people are dying of easy-to-cure diseases? Who would be sending AIDS relief to african sh!t holes? Why do you think that radical murderous muslims would just stop being a threat to every living thing on earth? Wake up.


-Jeffrey

Answer 3

thanks for the great thought.... though its not radioactive, but the energy generated by that sought of explosion which are two in number, nothing great would happen.... perhaps the Western and Central mould blow into pieces, oops sorry i mean melt into liquid..... but it will have a very good consequence, the rest of the would be happy and will be a secure place to live in as well...

Answer 4

You mean the neutron bomb. We've had it for decades and you don't even know about it. It doesn't even destroy buildings. Gamma rays destroy all life.

The US had it, first. Us alone and not one life was taken by it.

How's that for "CONSEQUENCES FOR THE WORLD"?

Answer 5

None. Through mutually assured destruction, no bombs would ever be used.

Answer 6

fear, and war as usual